ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ASSIGNMENT
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ASSIGNMENT
Use attachments to help with answer
For this question, you will develop an Annotated Bibliography with the six peer-reviewed research studies that address a problem of practice in your organization or profession. These six articles will include two quantitative studies, two qualitative studies, and two action research studies. For each study you will summarize the main findings and evaluate the quality, strengths, biases, and limitations of each study’s components. Your Annotated Bibliography will conclude with two sections: (a) methodological comparison in which you compare your two quantitative studies and two qualitative studies to your two action research studies for striking methodological similarities and differences, and (b) a practical applications section in which you describe what you learned from the six studies that can be applied to action research study proposal.
Area of Interest: Instructors are to find it a challenge to effectively engage students in the online sessions
Quantitative Research Studies:
Hall, R., & Lulich, J. (2021). University strategic plans: What they say about innovation. Innovative Higher Education, 46(3), 261-284. https://10.1007/s10755-020-09535-5
Jacobsen, C. B., Andersen, L. B., Bøllingtoft, A., & Eriksen, T. L. M. (2022). Can Leadership
Training Improve Organizational Effectiveness? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment on Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13356
qualitative articles
Zhang, J., Yuan, R., & Yu, S. (2017). What impedes the development of professional learning communities in China? Perceptions from leaders and frontline teachers in three schools in Shanghai. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/174114321561794
Simón, C., Muñoz-Martínez, Y., & Porter, G. L. (2021). Classroom instruction and practices that reach all learners. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(5), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1891205
Action research articles
Petersen, N., Rademeyer, V. & Ramsaroop, S. (2020). Building academic support in preservice teacher education using peer tutors: An educational action research project. Educational Research for Social Change, 9(2), 32-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2020/v9i2a3 . ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ASSIGNMENT
Lee, S. S., Hooi, S. C., Pan, T., Chong Hui Ann Fong, & Samarasekera, D. D. (2018). Improving a newly adapted teaching and learning approach: Collaborative learning cases using an action research. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 30(4), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2018.104
ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS
Annotated Bibliography
Insert your Name Here
School of Public Service and Education, Capella University
EDD8040: Research Design for Practitioners
Insert the Instructor’s Name Here
Insert the Due Date Here (Month, Day, Year)
Annotated Bibliography
Quantitative Study 1
Purpose and Main Results
Evaluation
Quantitative Study 2
Purpose and Main Results
Evaluation
Qualitative Study 1
Purpose and Main Findings
Evaluation
Qualitative Study 2
Purpose and Main Findings
Evaluation
Action Research Study 1
Purpose and Main Findings
Evaluation
Action Research Study 2
Purpose and Main Findings
Evaluation
Methodological Comparison
Practical Application
Annotated Bibliography
Insert your Name Here
School of Public Service and Education, Capella University
EDD8040: Research Design for Practitioners
Insert the Instructor’s Name Here
Insert the Due Date Here (Month, Day, Year)
[Important Writing Instructions]
[This assignment needs be written in the third person voice. Do not write in the first-person voice (I . . .). There should be none of you and your voice in this assignment or the course project. Do not use awkward language such as The researcher . . . or The learner when referring to yourself. Do not refer to yourself. Do not write in the second person voice (writing that uses or implies the language you or your).]
[Always present studies and other literature with past tense verbs (APA 7th ed. section 4.12 pp. 117-118); for example: Smith (2020) conducted . . . Scholarly writing is meant to be read and interpreted literally. Therefore, please avoid slang, colloquialisms, anthropomorphisms, and conversational writing (refer to APA 7th ed. pp. 113-125). Instead, be clear, precise, and accurate in your writing.] ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ASSIGNMENT
Here are two important self-assessment final steps to help ensure you do as well as you can with the assignment: When you complete your draft, read it aloud to yourself. This step can catch typos, grammar errors, awkward writing, etc. For a final step – self-assess your assignment by reviewing the corresponding scoring guide and compare the proficient and distinguished columns criteria to your draft and revise as necessary.]
Annotated Template with Instructions for Annotated Bibliography for u08a1
Quantitative Study 1
[Include the reference citation for your first quantitative study here. Ensure your reference citation is in the proper hanging indent format and aligned to APA publication manual 7th edition formatting rules (refer to Chapters 9 and 10).]
Purpose and Main Results
[Summarize the purpose of the study, the research questions, and the main results. Attempt to summarize or paraphrase as much as possible (see APA p. 269). When using a direct quote, ensure you provide complete and correct attributions. Refer to APA 7th ed. pp. 270-274. This section will typically contain 150 to 250 words.]
Evaluation
[Evaluate the study in terms of (a) its overall quality and strengths, (b) any biases and or limitations in its theoretical framework, literature review, sampling procedures, presentation of the results, and the study’s implications, and (c) its applicability or usefulness to your potential action research proposal you will submit in Week 9 and your potential Applied Improvement Project. Support your evaluation with examples and support from the literature. This section will typically contain 250 to 450 words.]
Quantitative Study 2
[Include the reference citation for your second quantitative study here. Ensure your reference citation is in the proper hanging indent format and aligned to APA publication manual 7th edition formatting rules (refer to Chapters 9 and 10).]
Purpose and Main Results
[Summarize the purpose of the study, the research questions, and the main results. Attempt to summarize or paraphrase as much as possible (see APA p. 269). When using a direct quote, ensure you provide complete and correct attributions. Refer to APA 7th ed. pp. 270-274. This section will typically contain 150 to 250 words.]
Evaluation
[Evaluate the study in terms of (a) its overall quality and strengths, (b) any biases and limitations in its theoretical framework, literature review, sampling procedures, presentation of the results, and the study’s implications, and (c) its applicability or usefulness to your potential action research proposal you will submit in Week 9 and your potential Applied Improvement Project. Support your evaluation with examples and support from the literature. This section will typically contain 250 to 450 words.] ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ASSIGNMENT
Qualitative Study 1
[Include the reference citation for your first qualitative study here. Ensure your reference citation is in the proper hanging indent format and aligned to APA publication manual 7th edition formatting rules (refer to Chapters 9 and 10).]
Purpose and Main Findings
[Summarize the purpose of the study, the research questions, and the main findings. Attempt to summarize or paraphrase as much as possible (see APA p. 269). When using a direct quote, ensure you provide complete and correct attributions. Refer to APA 7th ed. pp. 270-274. This section will typically contain 150 to 250 words.]
Evaluation
[Evaluate the study in terms of (a) its overall quality and strengths, (b) any biases and limitations in its theoretical framework, literature review, sampling procedures, presentation of the findings, and the study’s implications, and (c) its applicability or usefulness to your potential action research proposal you will submit in Week 9 and your potential Applied Improvement Project. Support your evaluation with examples and support from the literature. This section will typically contain 250 to 450 words.]
Qualitative Study 2
[Include the reference citation for your second qualitative study here. Ensure your reference citation is in the proper hanging indent format and aligned to APA publication manual 7th edition formatting rules (refer to Chapters 9 and 10).]
Purpose and Main Findings
[Summarize the purpose of the study, the research questions, and the main findings. Attempt to summarize or paraphrase as much as possible (see APA p. 269). When using a direct quote, ensure you provide complete and correct attributions. Refer to APA 7th ed. pp. 270-274. This section will typically contain 150 to 250 words.]
Evaluation
[Evaluate the study in terms of (a) its overall quality and strengths, (b) any biases and limitations in its theoretical framework, literature review, sampling procedures, presentation of the findings, and the study’s implications, and (c) its applicability or usefulness to your potential action research proposal you will submit in Week 9 and your potential Applied Improvement Project. Support your evaluation with examples and support from the literature. This section will typically contain 250 to 450 words.] ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ASSIGNMENT
Action Research Study 1
[Include the reference citation for your first qualitative study here. Ensure your reference citation is in the proper hanging indent format and aligned to APA publication manual 7th edition formatting rules (refer to Chapters 9 and 10).]
Purpose and Main Findings
[Summarize the purpose of the study, the research questions, and the main findings. Attempt to summarize or paraphrase as much as possible (see APA p. 269). When using a direct quote, ensure you provide complete and correct attributions. Refer to APA 7th ed. pp. 270-274. This section will typically contain 150 to 250 words.]
Evaluation
[Evaluate the study in terms of (a) its overall quality and strengths, (b) any biases and limitations in its theoretical framework, literature review, sampling procedures, presentation of the findings, and the study’s implications, and (c) its applicability or usefulness to your potential action research proposal you will submit in Week 9 and your potential Applied Improvement Project. Support your evaluation with examples and support from the literature. This section will typically contain 250 to 450 words.]
Action Research Study 2
[Include the reference citation for your second qualitative study here. Ensure your reference citation is in the proper hanging indent format and aligned to APA publication manual 7th edition formatting rules (refer to Chapters 9 and 10).]
Purpose and Main Findings
[Summarize the purpose of the study, the research questions, and the main findings. Attempt to summarize or paraphrase as much as possible (see APA p. 269). When using a direct quote, ensure you provide complete and correct attributions. Refer to APA 7th ed. pp. 270-274. This section will typically contain 150 to 250 words.]
Evaluation
[Evaluate the study in terms of (a) its overall quality and strengths, (b) any biases and limitations in its theoretical framework, literature review, sampling procedures, presentation of the findings, and the study’s implications, and (c) its applicability or usefulness to your potential action research proposal you will submit in Week 9 and your potential Applied Improvement Project. Support your evaluation with examples and support from the literature. This section will typically contain 250 to 450 words.]
Methodological Comparison
[Analyze and describe the most striking methodological similarities between your two quantitative studies and your two action research studies. Analyze and describe the most striking methodological similarities between your two qualitative studies and your two action research studies. Analyze and describe the most striking methodological differences between your two quantitative studies and your two action research studies. Analyze and describe the most striking methodological differences between your two qualitative studies and your two action research studies. Support your evaluation with examples and support from the literature. This section will typical contain 250 to 450 words.] ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ASSIGNMENT
Practical Application
[Briefly describe how what you learned from the studies can be applied to your action research proposal. Describe how you will incorporate or synthesize what you learned from the studies into your action research intervention or other aspects of the action research proposal.]
