Article Critique on Covid 19 Vaccine Sample Example
Article Critique on Covid 19 Vaccine Sample Example
Description
Read the article to get an understanding of the main idea. Read the
article again with a critical eye. As you read, take note of the
following: What are the credentials of the author/s? Is the author
qualified to write about the topic? Are the chosen research methods
appropriate to answer the research question(s)? Are there issues
related to the generalizability of the results? Is there evidence
of bias or a conflict of interest? Is the article timely and
relevant or is it outdated? Did the author/s ground their research
in theory and previous literature? What is included in an article
critique? In your own words: 1. Introduction 2. Summary 3.
Critique 4. Conclusion Instructions: 1. Prepare your report as a
paper with appropriate headings and use APA format ‐ Also see the web
link: http://www.apastyle.org/. 2. No more than five pages in
length, including the cover page (Word file, 1.5 spacing, font 12
TNR). 3. When you submit your assignment file, please also include. Article Critique on Covid 19 Vaccine Sample Example
the full article as a separate file. 4. Summary of the article
(limited to one page; DO NOT copy the abstract of the article) 5.
Information in the table below is just a guide for your critique
**PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED 2 FILES THAT CONTAINS THE MAIN ARTICLE AND
THE INSTRUCTIONS AND TEMPLAT
PHAR620 Assignment (Resit Students)
Writing an Article Critique
An article critique requires you to critically read a piece of research and identify and evaluate the
strengths and weaknesses of the article.
A critique may include with your own words, a brief summary, but the main focus should be on your
evaluation and analysis of the research itself.
Choose an article that meets the criteria outlined by your instructor (1 article; 10%) and research
supervisor (1 article; 10%).
Read the article to get an understanding of the main idea.
Read the article again with a critical eye.
As you read, take note of the following:
What are the credentials of the author/s? Is the author qualified to write about the topic?
Are the chosen research methods appropriate to answer the research question(s)?
Are there issues related to the generalizability of the results?
Is there evidence of bias or a conflict of interest?
Is the article timely and relevant or is it outdated?
Did the author/s ground their research in theory and previous literature? Article Critique on Covid 19 Vaccine Sample Example
What is included in an article critique?
In your own words:
1. Introduction
2. Summary
3. Critique
4. Conclusion
Instructions:
1. Prepare your report as a paper with appropriate headings and use APA format ‐ Also see the
web link: http://www.apastyle.org/.
2. No more than five pages in length, including the cover page (Word file, 1.5 spacing, font 12
TNR).
3. When you submit your assignment file, please also include the full article as a separate file.
4. Summary of the article (limited to one page; DO NOT copy the abstract of the article)
5. Information in the table below is just a guide for your critique.
Section Questions to guide evaluation Comments and
critique
Problem
statement and
purpose
1. What is the problem and/or purpose of the research study?
2. Does the problem or purpose statement express a relationship
between two or more variables? If so, what is/are the
relationship(s)? Are they testable?
3. Does the problem statement and/or purpose specify the nature of
the population being studied? What is it?
4. What significance of the problem, if any, has the investigator
identified?
Include in your five pages in length
assignment
Review of
literature and
theoretical
framework. Article Critique on Covid 19 Vaccine Sample Example
1. What concepts are included in the review? Of particular
importance, note those concepts that are the independent and
dependent variables and how they are conceptually defined.
2. Does the literature review make the relationships among the
variables explicit or place the variables within a
theoretical/conceptual framework? What are the relationships?
3. What gaps or conflicts in knowledge of the problem are identified?
4. Are the references cited by the author mostly primary or secondary
sources? Give an example of each.
5. What are the operational definitions of the independent and
dependent variables? Do they reflect the conceptual definitions?
Hypotheses or
research questions
1. What hypotheses or research questions are stated in the study?
2. If research questions are stated, are they used in addition to
hypotheses or to guide an exploratory study?
3. What are the independent and dependent variables in the
statement of each hypothesis or research question?
4. If hypotheses are stated, is the form of the statement statistical
(also called null) or research?
5. What is the direction of the relationship in each hypothesis, if
indicated?
6. Are the hypotheses testable?
Sample 1. How was the sample selected?
2. What type of sampling method is used? Is it appropriate to the
design?
3. Does the sample reflect the population as identified in the problem
or purpose statement?
4. Is the sample size appropriate?
5. To what population may the findings be generalized? What are the
limitations in generalizability?
Research design 1. What type of design is used?
2. Does the design seem to flow from the proposed research
problem, theoretical framework, literature review, and
hypothesis? Article Critique on Covid 19 Vaccine Sample Example
3. What type(s) of data‐collection method(s) is/are used in the study?
4. Are the data‐collection procedures similar for all subjects?
5. How have the rights of subjects been protected?
6. What indications are given that informed consent of the subjects
has been ensured?
Instruments 1. Research measurement: Is a rationale given for why a particular
instrument or method was selected? If so, what is it? What
provision is made for maintaining the accuracy of the instrument and
its use, if any?
2. Observational methods: Who did the observing? How were the
observers trained to minimize bias? Was there an observational
guide? Were the observers required to make inferences about what
they saw? Is there any reason to believe that the presence of the
observers affect the behavior of the subjects?
3. Interviews: Who were the interviewers? How were they trained to
minimize the bias? Is there evidence of any interview bias? If so, what
was it?
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW
4. Questionnaires: What is the type and/or format of the
questionnaire(s) (e.g. Likert, open‐ended)? Is (Are) it (they) consistent
with the conceptual definition(s)?
5. Available data and records: Are the records that were used
appropriate to the problem being studied? Are the data being used to
describe the sample or to test the hypothesis?
6. What type of reliability is reported for each instrument?
7. What level of reliability is reported? Is it acceptable?
8. What type of validity is reported for each instrument?
9. Does the validity of each instrument seem adequate? Why?
Analysis of data 1. What level of measurement is used to measure each of the major
variables?
2. What descriptive or inferential statistics are reported?
3. Were these descriptive or inferential statistics appropriate to the
level of measurement for each variable?
4. Are the inferential statistics used appropriate to the intent of the
hypotheses?
5. Does the author report the level of significance set for the study? If
so, what is it?
6. If tables or figures are used, do they meet the following standards?
They supplement and economize the text. They have precise titles
and headings.Article Critique on Covid 19 Vaccine Sample Example. They do not repeat the text.
Conclusions,
implications,
recommendations,
and utilization for
patient care,
pharmacy practice
and research
1. If hypothesis testing was done, was/were the hypotheses
supported or not supported?
2. Are the results interpreted in the context of the problem/purpose,
hypothesis, and theoretical framework/literature reviewed?
3. What relevance for pharmacy practice does the investigator
identify, if any?
4. What generalizations are made?
5. Are the generalizations within the scope of the findings or beyond
the findings?
6. What recommendations for future research are stated or implied?
7. Are there other studies with similar findings?
8. What risks/benefits are involved for patients if the research
findings would be used in practice?
9. Is direct application of the research findings feasible in terms of
time, effort, money, and legal/ethical risks?
10. How and under what circumstances are the findings applicable to
pharmacy practice?
11. Should these results be applied to pharmacy practice?
12. Would it be possible to replicate this study in another clinical
practice setting?
The_Article_that_you_should_do_critique_for
Article Critique on Covid 19 Vaccine Sample Example
