Position papers are a method to evaluate the most current evidence and policies related to health care issues. They offer a way for researchers to explore the views of any number of organizations around a topic. This can help you to develop your own position and approach to care around a topic or issue. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population

 

This assessment will focus on analyzing position papers about an issue related to addiction, chronicity, emotional and mental health, genetics and genomics, or immunity. Many of these topics are quickly evolving as technology advances, or as we attempt to push past stigmas. For example, technological advances and DNA sequencing provide comprehensive information to allow treatment to become more targeted and effective for the individual. However, as a result, nurses must be able to understand and teach patients about the impact of this information. With this great power comes concerns that patient conditions are protected in an ethical and compassionate manner.

 

Position papers are a way for individuals, groups, and organizations to express their views and intentions toward a specific issue. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population. In health care, many position papers address specific policies, regulations, or other approaches to care. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you should feel empowered to express and advocate for your own views on policy and care matters. This is especially important when it comes to populations you or your organization cares for that are not receiving the quality, type, or amount of care that they require.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER NOW

An important skill in creating a position paper or policy proposal is the ability to analyze and synthesize others’ views about the population or issue of interest to you. By synthesizing the positive and negative views of an issue, you can become better equipped to strengthen your own arguments and respond to opposing views in an informed and convincing way.

 

Professional Context

 

Position papers are a way for individuals, groups, and organizations to express their views and intentions toward a specific issue. In health care, many position papers address specific policies, regulations, or other approaches to care. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you should feel empowered to express and advocate for your own views on policy and care matters. This is especially important when it comes to populations you or your organization cares for that are not receiving the quality, type, or amount of care that they require. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population

 

An important skill in creating a position paper or policy proposal is the ability to analyze and synthesize others’ views about the population or issue of interest to you. By synthesizing the positive and negative views of an issue, you can become better equipped to strengthen your own arguments and to respond to opposing views in an informed and convincing way.

 

Scenario

 

For this assessment, pretend you are a member of an interprofessional team that is attempting to improve the quality and outcomes of health care in a vulnerable population. For the first step in your team’s work, you have decided to conduct an analysis of current position papers that address the issue and population you are considering.

 

In your analysis, you will note the team’s initial views on the issue in the population as well as the views across a variety of relevant position papers. You have been tasked with finding the most current standard of care or evidenced-based practice and evaluating both the pros and cons of the issue. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population. For the opposing viewpoints, it is important to discuss how the team could respond to encourage support. This paper will be presented to a committee of relevant stakeholders from your care setting and the community. If it receives enough support, you will be asked to create a new policy that could be enacted to improve the outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population.

 

The care setting, population, and health care issue that you use for this assessment will be used in the other assessments in this course. Consider your choice carefully. There are two main approaches for you to take in selecting the scenario for this assessment:

 

1. You may use one of the issues and populations presented in the  Vila Health: Health Challenges in Different Populations  media piece. For this approach, you may consider the population in the context of the Vila Health care setting, or translate it into the context in which you currently practice or have had recent experience. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population

 

2. You may select a population and issue that is of interest to you and set them in the context of your current or desired future care setting. While you are free to choose any population of interest, the issue you choose should fall within one of the following broad categories:

 

· Genetics and genomics.

 

· Sickle cell, asthma, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis.

 

· Immunity.

 

· Type 1 diabetes, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), congenital neutropenia syndrome.

 

· Chronicity.

 

· Arthritis, any type of cancer or lung or heart disease, obesity. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population

 

· Addiction.

 

· Abuse of alcohol, prescription drugs, tobacco, illegal substances.

 

· Emotion and mental health.

 

· Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, eating disorders, psychosis.

 

Note: If you choose the second option, contact your faculty to make sure that your chosen issue and population will fit within the topic areas for this course. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population

 

Instructions

 

For this assessment, you will develop a position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your assessment submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Analysis of Position Papers for Vulnerable Populations Scoring Guide and  Guiding Questions: Analysis of Position Papers for Vulnerable Populations [DOC]  Download Guiding Questions: Analysis of Position Papers for Vulnerable Populations [DOC] to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

 

· Explain a position with regard to health outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

 

· Explain the role of the interprofessional team in facilitating improvements for a specific issue in a target population.

 

· Evaluate the evidence and positions of others that could support a team’s approach to improving the quality and outcomes of care for a specific issue in a target population. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population

 

· Evaluate the evidence and positions of others that are contrary to a team’s approach to improving the quality and outcomes of care for a specific issue in a target population.

 

· Communicate an initial viewpoint regarding a specific issue in a target population and a synthesis of existing positions in a logically structured and concise manner, writing content clearly with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

 

· Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

 

Example assessment: You may use the  Assessment 1 Example [PDF]  Download Assessment 1 Example [PDF] to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population

 

Submission Requirements

 

· Length of submission: 4–6 double-spaced, typed pages, not including the title and reference pages. Your plan should be succinct yet substantive. No abstract is required.

 

· Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your initial position on the issue, as well as a minimum of 2–3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that express contrary views or opinions. Resources should be no more than five years old.

 

· APA formatting: Use the  APA Style Paper Template [DOCX]  and the  APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]  to help you in writing and formatting your analysis.

 

Competencies Measured

 

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

 

· Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.

 

· Evaluate the evidence and positions of others that could support a team’s approach to improving the quality and outcomes of care for a specific issue in a target population. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population

ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER NOW

· Evaluate the evidence and positions of others that are contrary to a team’s approach for improving the quality and outcomes of care for a specific issue in a target population.

 

· Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.

 

· Explain the role of the interprofessional team in facilitating improvements for a specific issue in a target population.

 

· Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.

 

· Explain a position with regard to health outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

 

· Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population

 

· Communicate an initial viewpoint regarding a specific issue in a target population and a synthesis of existing positions in a logically structured and concise manner.

 

· Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Develop a 4-6 page position summary and an analysis of relevant position papers on a health care issue in a chosen population

This assignment is related to the course’s final assignment that students contribute to throughout the course. Students will base this assignment on the topic that was selected in Week 2. In this assignment, students should create a well-developed thesis statement that encompasses what the final assignment essay will be about. An outline of the final assignment should be developed. This should include the five-paragraph outline structure using Roman numerals (Intro, body with three subheadings, and conclusion) with headings and subheadings and includes many details. HSE-480 Week 4 Assignment

ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER NOW

A concluding statement in the form of a conclusion should be created with this week’s assignment. References that were identified in last week’s annotated bibliography and that are going to be used to support the main points of the final assignment should be included on this assignment in APA format.

 

TOPIC FOR WEEK 2: Strategies to protect the U.S. homeland from turmoil in the Middle East.

 

Week 4 Assignment Rubric

 

Criteria

 

15 points

 

20 points

Thesis Statement

Thesis statement mostly includes elements of what essay will be about.

Well- developed thesis statement that encompasses what the essay will be about. HSE-480 Week 4 Assignment

Concluding Statement

Concluding statement mostly reviews subject and comes to a logical conclusion.

Concluding statement reviews subject and comes to a logical conclusion.

Headings and Subheadings

Mostly describes each header and associated sub-headers in the outline.

Describes each header and associated sub-headers in the outline.

Format of Outline

Mostly follows the example using the five-paragraph outline structure using Roman numerals (Intro, body with three subheadings, and conclusion) with headings and subheadings and includes details. HSE-480 Week 4 Assignment

Follows the example using the five-paragraph outline structure using Roman numerals (Intro, body with three subheadings, and conclusion) with headings and subheadings and includes many details.

Grammar

Very few grammatical mistakes throughout.

No major grammatical errors throughout.

Academic Writing refers to a formal writing style used scholars and is the main style of writing for colleges and universities.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER NOW

Characteristics

 

· Formal tone and clear language

 

· Third person (usually)

 

· Formatted into structured sentences and paragraphs

 

· Logical and organized ideas

 

· Contains an argument or position that is thesis driven, focuses on thesis statement

 

· Contains sound research and evidence to support the thesis

 

· Uses higher order thinking skills to explain concepts

 

· Proper citation management style used for both in-text and reference list citations. HSE-480 Week 4 Assignment

 

Consider the ethical dilemma the healthcare professional faces in the selected case study. Pay particular attention to details that will help you analyze the situation using the three components of the Ethical Decision Making Model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior).

Note: The case study may not supply all the information you need for the assignment. In such cases, you should consider various possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any speculations that you make. Ethical Case Study-To Vaccinate or Not

ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER NOW

Incident 10: To Vaccinate, or Not?

Jenna and Chris Smith are the proud parents of Ana, a 55–day–baby girl born without complications at a Community Hospital. Since delivery, the parents have bonded well with Ana and expressed their desire to raise her as naturally as possible. For the Smiths, this means breastfeeding exclusively for the first six months, making their baby food using pureed organic foods, and not allowing Ana to be vaccinated.

The Smiths are educated and explain they have researched vaccines and decided the potential harms they caused far outweigh any benefits. They point to the rise in autism rates as proof of the unforeseen risk of vaccines. Their new pediatrician, Dr. Angela Kerr, listens intently to the Smiths’ description of their research, including online mommy–blogs that detail how vaccines may have caused autism in many children. The Smiths conclude by resolutely stating they’ve decided not to vaccinate An despite the medical community’s recommendations. Ethical Case Study-To Vaccinate or Not

Dr. Kerr states that while vaccines have sparked controversy in recent years, she strongly recommends that Ana become fully vaccinated. Dr. Kerr explains that vaccines have saved the lives of millions of children worldwide and have been largely responsible for decreases in child mortality over the past century. For example, the decreased incidence of infection with the potentially fatal Haemophilus influenzae type b has resulted from routine immunization against that bacterium. Similarly, epidemics such as the recent measles outbreak are usually associated with individuals who have not been vaccinated against that pathogen.

Dr. Kerr goes on to endorse the general safety of vaccines by informing Ana’s parents that safety profiles of vaccines are updated regularly through data sources such as the federal government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The VAERS, a nationwide vaccine safety surveillance program sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is accessible to the public at https://vaers.hhs.gov/index. This system allows transparency for vaccine safety by encouraging the public and healthcare providers to report adverse reactions to vaccines and enables the federal government to monitor their safety. No vaccine has been proven casual for autism spectrum disorder (ASD, or any developmental disorder. On the contrary, many studies have shown that vaccines containing thimerasol, an ingredient once thought to cause autism, do not increase the risk of ASD.

Finally, Dr. Kerr reminds the Smiths that some children in the general population have weakened immune systems because of genetic diseases or cancer treatment, for example. It may not be medically feasible to vaccinate such children. Other children are too young to receive certain immunizations. Instead, these children are protected because almost all other children (and adults) have been vaccinated, decreasing their exposure to vaccine–preventable illnesses (VPIs). This epidemiological concept is known as “herd immunity.” As more parents refuse immunization for their healthy children, the rate of VPIs will increase. This puts vulnerable children at significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Routine childhood immunization contributes significantly to the health of the general public by providing a direct benefit to those vaccinated and by protecting others via herd immunity. Dr. Kerr concludes by stating that after considering the risks versus the benefits of immunization, most states require vaccinations before children can attend school. However, parents may decide not to vaccinate under specific circumstances, which vary by state. Ethical Case Study-To Vaccinate or Not

Jenna and Chris Smith confirm their understanding of what Dr. Kerr has explained but restate that they do not want Ana vaccinated now. Dr. Kerr is perplexed as to what to do.

Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a healthcare professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues and a possible solution in a 3-5 page paper.

Introduction
Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions. Ethical Case Study-To Vaccinate or Not

Instructions
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma a healthcare professional faces. In your assessment:

Access the Ethical Case Studies media piece to review the case studies you will use for this assessment.
Select the case most closely related to your area of interest and use it to complete the assessment.
Note: The case study may not supply all the necessary information. In such cases, you should consider various possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make. Ethical Case Study-To Vaccinate or Not
Include the selected case study using APA style and format in your reference list. Refer to the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for guidance.
Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.
Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.
Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue.
Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.
Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media.
Analyze the factors contributing to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study.
Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.
Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER NOW

In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella Library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide will help you locate appropriate references. Ethical Case Study-To Vaccinate or Not
Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.
Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource.
Assess the credibility of the information source.
Assess the relevance of the information source.
Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
Describe how the healthcare professional in the case study communicated with others.
Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.
Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches.
Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.
Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study.
Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.
Discuss the key lessons this case provides for healthcare professionals.
Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study. Ethical Case Study-To Vaccinate or Not
Describe the proposed solution.
Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within the organization.
Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.
Write clearly and logically, using correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Apply the principles of effective composition.
Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.
Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style. Ethical Case Study-To Vaccinate or Not