Posts

Personality Analysis Assignment essay paper

/in /by

Personality Analysis Assignment

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Personality Assignment – Due April 8th

 

Now that you complete the MBTI assessment in the Week Three Discussion Board, this assignment will require you to use your findings and give a more comprehensive analysis of your personality.  Also please read the lecture material in the Week Four Module, and Chapter Two of the textbook, for the paper.  Don’t forget to cite your sources.  See the rubric for specifics on grading.

1) Describe the four basic dimensions styles of the MBTI Personality Analysis Assignment

2)   Discuss your specific personality type, including all four dimensions, i.e. ENFP.  Give SPECIFIC examples of how this assessment does or does not apply to you and your management style. This analysis needs to include how this style affects your communication on the job. In other words, how does your stye affect the way you communicate with others?  Were you aware of this communication style?  How has your style helped you or hindered your work performance or success? Personality Analysis Assignment

3)   Identify a current co-worker’s MBTI’s style giving several examples of how they communicates and how they behave.   Look at the material on the specific styles and be sure you to do cite that material. Personality Analysis Assignment

4)   How might you have a conflict with this co-worker?  What can you do to resolve that conflict positively and what could you do that would resolve the conflict ineffectively?

 

 

Personality Analysis Assignment

 

 

Write the questions out completely and then answer them one at a time. You must first demonstrate that you understand this theory, and then apply it.  This paper should be a minimum of 5-6 pages. It may be longer, with 5-7 citation sources.   Do not quote directly from the text but put this material in your own words being sure to document. Use the APA (7the edition) format to document the websites.  Please consult the writing guidelines for the course.

 

Personality Analysis Assignment

Comprehension and Application Rubric

Applied to Personality/Communication Styles

 

  Excellent (3) Acceptable (2) Unacceptable (1)
Connections to Discipline

Sees (makes) connections across disciplines, perspectives

 Thoroughly discusses each of the four dimension of the MBTI. discussion should include material on how these dimensions might communicate.  Be sure to include material from the text. Adequately discusses each of the four dimension of the MBTI using the website and text. Is lacking some knowledge of the four dimension of the MBTI
Reflection and Self-Assessment

Demonstrates a developing sense of self as a learner, building on prior experiences to respond to new and challenging contexts (may be evident in self-assessment, reflective, or creative work)

 Thoroughly applies Type to himself.  You must identify all four letters of your style. Discusses style as a whole as well.  Accurately applies the material to himself using many examples from work experiences. Also discusses the style as a whole. Adequately applies Type to a self-analysis by giving some examples. Minimally applies Type to a self-analysis.  The paper does not include examples or does not apply the MBTI correctly.
Connections to Experience

Connects relevant experience and academic knowledge.

 Correctly identifies the style of a co-worker giving specific examples of how he or she communicates. This identification should include a discussion of all four letters.

 

 

 Identifies the style of coworker but does give many examples Personality Analysis Assignment

 

 

 Either doesn’t identify a style, includes no examples, or incorrectly identifies the style.

 

 
Transfer

Adapts and applies skills, abilities, theories, or methodologies gained in one situation to new situations.

 Thoroughly discusses a conflict which he could have with his co-worker including the perspectives of both personality styles. Discusses strategies which would produce both a positive and a negative outcome. Discusses a conflict which he could have with his co-worker including the perspectives of both personality styles. Proposes strategies which would produce a positive outcome.

 

 

 Has little idea how to handle a conflict with his co-worker considering both personality styles.

 

 

 

 

 

 
Integrated Communication Paper reflects good grammar, spelling, syntax, and writing technique. The writer’s style is clear, concise, and well organized.  The writer uses terms that are easily understood.  APA format is used accurately and consistently Paper reflects good grammar, spelling, and writing technique APA format is used accurately most of the time. APA format is not used to an acceptable level.  Paper may include grammar, documentation, or writing technique problems.

 

 

 

(Adapted from Dr. Melody Hufman)

 

 

Personality Analysis Assignment essay paper

/in /by

Personality Analysis Assignment

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Theories of Management

 

 

 

Most theories of management communication add insights to help us relate to our employees effectively.  Many of these theories are complimentary to each other. On some level, all management theories are about communication by definition. The best way of understanding the theories of management is by understanding management as a lower level component of leading, and as Johnson and Hackman (2018) note, understanding leading from a communication perspective.  As you Personality Analysis Assignment read about these theories, try to think about what your management style might be.  You can learn a lot about yourself by analyzing your style.  How does your style affect your communication and your employees?  Once you understand yourself, you can better understand your employees. Your textbooks provide you with a wide variety of theories to explore.

 

 

Theory X and Theory Y are two of the oldest theories.  Theory X basically suggests that people have to be made to work because if they were given the choice, they would rather play.  Theory Y on the other hand says that work is as “natural as play.”  Theory X says that employees need to be directed while Theory Y indicates that employees will naturally provide self-direction which will be profitable to the company.  Theory X suggests that people avoid responsibility while Theory Y indicates that employees will naturally seek and enjoy responsibility.  Theory X proposes that people are motivated by money, while Theory Y indicates that people can be motivated by work itself.  I am sure that you have read about these theories in other classes.  Which theory makes the most sense to you?

Personality Analysis Assignment

How do these theories affect the communication of the manager?  In the right situation, most of us would probably have to admit that we enjoy working.  We were literally created to work.  But it is possible to have a manager which does not recognize that his employees enjoy working.

 

When Ouchi studied the Japanese management style, he described it as Theory Z.   In the Japanese culture, college graduates are courted by the best businesses and they stay with those companies throughout their lives.  They are advanced by their seniority and not by their productivity or creativity.  They often work from 7 in the morning until 7 at night.  Then the men go to the local pub and drink while discussing issues at work.  You can see how this puts the women at a disadvantage.  The communication mandate of this culture id that work influences everything you do in your lives.  Now while this theory sounds interesting, it is impractical in the American Culture because few Americans are willing to make that sacrifice—to give their entire lives to a company.  Most Americans prefer to keep to maintain some kind of personal life.

Personality Analysis Assignment

 

Fred Fiedler Contingency theory is interesting because he suggests that it does not matter what kind of leader you are as long as your leadership style matches your leadership situation.  In other words, if your management position is not working, it is because the job doesn’t match your style.  I like that perspective.  If you need to be more productive, you need to change the situation not you.  After all it is much easier to change the situation than to change yourself.  We are not easily changed.

 

Fielder says that there are two types of leaders: high task and high relationship.  He called these styles Low LPCs (task leader) and High LPC (relationship leader.)  LPC stands for least preferred coworker.  After all, we only have one LPC.  There is only one person that we would least prefer to have on our team, have as an employee, or worst yet, have as a boss.  Who we select as our least preferred co-worker tells us more about ourselves than it does about that person.  For example, if we see the LPC in totally negative terms, we are so concerned about the task that when someone does not help us accomplish the task, we believe that everything about him is negative.  High LPCs do not see their least preferred coworker so negatively. While they do not want to work with him or her, but they believe their LPC has some redeeming characteristics.  They differentiate between the task and the person; they are more relationship oriented.  This about how these styles affects communication.

Personality Analysis Assignment

The fascinating prediction about Fielder’s Theory is that it doesn’t matter what kind of leader you are, it just matters if you are in a situation which matches your leadership style.   A Low LPC works effectively in a situation where everything is going well.  The task is clear.  The people are happy and he has a lot of power.  He also works well in a situation where everything is going poorly because in that bad situation he will carry the load all by himself in order to accomplish the task.  The High LPC works well in the intermediate situation where he has a few challenges to keep him interested.  He becomes bored if everything is going well.  He becomes frustrated if he has too many challenges.  So if the leadership style matches the leadership situation, performance is maximized.  The High LPC enjoyed communicating through challenges while the Low LPC enjoys communicating so he can work effectively.

Heresey and Blanchard’s theory suggests that the leader needs to match his management style to his employees.  For example, if you have employees that have low abilities and low willingness to work, you are going to have to tell them or direct them to do their jobs.  On the other hand if you have employees with high abilities and a high willingness to work, you should simply delgate your authority to your employees empowering them.  If you have employees who are willing but have low abilities, you will need to support them. They need guidance.  Finally if you have employees with great skills, but are not willing to work, you need to promote their involvement by coaching them and by selling the job to them.In each case, you communicate with the four types of employees differently. Personality Analysis Assignment

 

 

In every theory, the communication is influenced by the styles of the various employees and managers.

 

 

(Adapted from Dr. Melody Hufman)

 

 

 

Personality Analysis Assignment essay paper

/in /by

Personality Analysis Assignment

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Personality Assignment – Due April 8th

 

Now that you complete the MBTI assessment in the Week Three Discussion Board, this assignment will require you to use your findings and give a more comprehensive analysis of your personality.  Also please read the lecture material in the Week Four Module, and Chapter Two of the textbook, for the paper.  Don’t forget to cite your sources.  See the rubric for specifics on grading.

1) Describe the four basic dimensions styles of the MBTI Personality Analysis Assignment

2)   Discuss your specific personality type, including all four dimensions, i.e. ENFP.  Give SPECIFIC examples of how this assessment does or does not apply to you and your management style. This analysis needs to include how this style affects your communication on the job. In other words, how does your stye affect the way you communicate with others?  Were you aware of this communication style?  How has your style helped you or hindered your work performance or success?

3)   Identify a current co-worker’s MBTI’s style giving several examples of how they communicates and how they behave.   Look at the material on the specific styles and be sure you to do cite that material.

4)   How might you have a conflict with this co-worker?  What can you do to resolve that conflict positively and what could you do that would resolve the conflict ineffectively? Personality Analysis Assignment

 

 

 

 

 

Write the questions out completely and then answer them one at a time. You must first demonstrate that you understand this theory, and then apply it.  This paper should be a minimum of 5-6 pages. It may be longer, with 5-7 citation sources.   Do not quote directly from the text but put this material in your own words being sure to document. Use the APA (7the edition) format to document the websites.  Please consult the writing guidelines for the course.

Personality Analysis Assignment

 

Comprehension and Application Rubric

Applied to Personality/Communication Styles

 

  Excellent (3) Acceptable (2) Unacceptable (1)
Connections to Discipline

Sees (makes) connections across disciplines, perspectives

 Thoroughly discusses each of the four dimension of the MBTI. discussion should include material on how these dimensions might communicate.  Be sure to include material from the text. Adequately discusses each of the four dimension of the MBTI using the website and text. Personality Analysis Assignment Is lacking some knowledge of the four dimension of the MBTI
Reflection and Self-Assessment

Demonstrates a developing sense of self as a learner, building on prior experiences to respond to new and challenging contexts (may be evident in self-assessment, reflective, or creative work)

 Thoroughly applies Type to himself.  You must identify all four letters of your style. Discusses style as a whole as well.  Accurately applies the material to himself using many examples from work experiences. Also discusses the style as a whole. Adequately applies Type to a self-analysis by giving some examples. Minimally applies Type to a self-analysis.  The paper does not include examples or does not apply the MBTI correctly.
Connections to Experience

Connects relevant experience and academic knowledge.

 Correctly identifies the style of a co-worker giving specific examples of how he or she communicates. This identification should include a discussion of all four letters.

 

 

 Identifies the style of coworker but does give many examples

 

 

 Either doesn’t identify a style, includes no examples, or incorrectly identifies the style.

 

 
Transfer

Adapts and applies skills, abilities, theories, or methodologies gained in one situation to new situations.

 Thoroughly discusses a conflict which he could have with his co-worker including the perspectives of both personality styles. Discusses strategies which would produce both a positive and a negative outcome. Discusses a conflict which he could have with his co-worker including the perspectives of both personality styles. Proposes strategies which would produce a positive outcome. Personality Analysis Assignment

 

 

 Has little idea how to handle a conflict with his co-worker considering both personality styles.

 

 

 

 

 

 
Integrated Communication Paper reflects good grammar, spelling, syntax, and writing technique. The writer’s style is clear, concise, and well organized.  The writer uses terms that are easily understood.  APA format is used accurately and consistently Paper reflects good grammar, spelling, and writing technique APA format is used accurately most of the time. APA format is not used to an acceptable level.  Paper may include grammar, documentation, or writing technique problems.

 

 

 

(Adapted from Dr. Melody Hufman)

 

 

Personality Analysis Assignment essay paper

/in /by

Personality Analysis Assignment

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Theories of Management

Most theories of management communication add Personality Analysis Assignment insights to help us relate to our employees effectively. Many of these theories are complimentary to each other. On some level, all management theories are about communication by definition. The best way of understanding the theories of management is by understanding management as a lower level component of leading, and as Johnson and Hackman (2018) note, understanding leading from a communication perspective. As you read about these theories, try to think about what your management style might be. You can learn a lot about yourself by analyzing your style. How does your style affect your communication and your employees? Once you understand yourself, you can better understand your employees. Your textbooks provide you with a wide variety of theories to explore. Personality Analysis Assignment

Theory X and Theory Y are two of the oldest theories. Theory X basically suggests that people have to be made to work because if they were given the choice, they would rather play. Theory Y on the other hand says that work is as “natural as play.” Theory X says that employees need to be directed while Theory Y indicates that employees will naturally provide self-direction which will be profitable to the company. Theory X suggests that people avoid responsibility while Theory Y indicates that employees will naturally seek and enjoy responsibility. Theory X proposes that people are motivated by money, while Theory Y indicates that people can be motivated by work itself. I am sure that you have read about these theories in other classes. Which theory makes the most sense to you?

How do these theories affect the communication of the manager? In the right situation, most of us would probably have to admit that we enjoy working. We were literally created to work. But it is possible to have a manager which does not recognize that his employees enjoy working. Personality Analysis Assignment

When Ouchi studied the Japanese management style, he described it as Theory Z. In the Japanese culture, college graduates are courted by the best businesses and they stay with those companies throughout their lives. They are advanced by their seniority and not by their productivity or creativity. They often work from 7 in the morning until 7 at night. Then the men go to the local pub and drink while discussing issues at work. You can see how this puts the women at a disadvantage. The communication mandate of this culture id that work influences everything you do in your lives. Now while this theory sounds interesting, it is impractical in the American Culture because few Americans are willing to make that sacrifice—to give their entire lives to a company. Most Americans prefer to keep to maintain some kind of personal life.

Fred Fiedler Contingency theory is interesting because he suggests that it does not matter what kind of leader you are as long as your leadership style matches your leadership situation. In other words, if your management position is not working, it is because the job doesn’t match your style. I like that perspective. If you need to be more productive, you need to change the situation not you. After all it is much easier to change the situation than to change yourself. We are not easily changed.

Fielder says that there are two types of leaders: high task and high relationship. He called these styles Low LPCs (task leader) and High LPC (relationship leader.) LPC stands for least preferred coworker. After all, we only have one LPC. There is only one person that we would least prefer to have on our team, have as an employee, or worst yet, have as a boss. Who we select as our least preferred co-worker tells us more about ourselves than it does about that person. For example, if we see the LPC in totally negative terms, we are so concerned about the task that when someone does not help us accomplish the task, we believe that everything about him is negative. High LPCs do not see their least preferred coworker so negatively. While they do not want to work with him or her, but they believe their LPC has some redeeming characteristics. They differentiate between the task and the person; they are more relationship oriented. This about how these styles affects communication. Personality Analysis Assignment

The fascinating prediction about Fielder’s Theory is that it doesn’t matter what kind of leader you are, it just matters if you are in a situation which matches your leadership style. A Low LPC works effectively in a situation where everything is going well. The task is clear. The people are happy and he has a lot of power. He also works well in a situation where everything is going poorly because in that bad situation he will carry the load all by himself in order to accomplish the task. The High LPC works well in the intermediate situation where he has a few challenges to keep him interested. He becomes bored if everything is going well. He becomes frustrated if he has too many challenges. So if the leadership style matches the leadership situation, performance is maximized. The High LPC enjoyed communicating through challenges while the Low LPC enjoys communicating so he can work effectively.

Heresey and Blanchard’s theory suggests that the leader needs to match his management style to his employees. For example, if you have employees that have low abilities and low willingness to work, you are going to have to tell them or direct them to do their jobs. On the other hand if you have employees with high abilities and a high willingness to work, you should simply delgate your authority to your employees empowering them. If you have employees who are willing but have low abilities, you will need to support them. They need guidance. Finally if you have employees with great skills, but are not willing to work, you need to promote their involvement by coaching them and by selling the job to them.In each case, you communicate with the four types of employees differently.

In every theory, the communication is influenced by the styles of the various employees and managers. Personality Analysis Assignment

(Adapted from Dr. Melody Hufman)