Week 2 Interactive Case Study Journal

Week 2 Interactive Case Study Journal

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Week 2 Interactive Case Study Journal

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Week 2 Interactive Case Study Journal
Just from $15/Page
Order Essay
  • Due No Due Date

 

  • Points 50

 

  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Click on this link to view the Staffing Issues Interactive Case Study.

After you view the case study, reflect upon what you have learned and how it is related to the learning materials. Compare the case study to your nursing practice and give a similar example from your experience in which you might have run into staffing issues.

Submit your entry by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time). Your reflection content should be a minimum of 500 words, equal to five to six paragraphs, and is worth 50 points.

Rubric

NURS_440_OL – Case Study Rubric (1)

NURS_440_OL – Case Study Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
20 to >17.8 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers detailed and specific examples for all questions. Makes keen observations, making note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions.

17.8 to >15.0 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers some detail and some examples for most questions. Makes occasional note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions.

15 to >11.8 pts

Below Expectations

Provides insufficient explanations of significant concepts. Offers little or insignificant detail and no examples for most questions. Fails to address essential information provided in the case. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusion.

11.8 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
15 to >13.35 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Makes insightful, clear and accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case.

13.35 to >11.25 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Makes mostly accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case.

11.25 to >8.85 pts

Below Expectations

Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explanations, although attempts are made to address some key concepts. Response indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts presented in the case.

8.85 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of the concepts presented in the case.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
10 to >8.9 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

8.9 to >7.5 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.

7.5 to >5.9 pts

Below Expectations

Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors.

5.9 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

Answers are not well written and lack clarity. Information is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
5 to >4.45 pts

Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.

4.45 to >3.75 pts

Mostly Meets Expectations

Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout.

3.75 to >2.95 pts

Below Expectations

Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.

2.95 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements.

5 pts
Total Points: 50