Case Study essay paper
Case Study
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOWEthical Theory Matrix
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Case Study essay paper
Just from $15/Page
| Theory | Decision Criteria | Your Example | Strengths | Weaknesses |
| Utilitarianism
|
The decisions of Utilitarianism are based on the consequences and outcomes. There are various theories of ethics, and the decision criteria are different. When it comes to Utilitarianism, the results are only observed. The people have to see whether the results will be positive. The decision will be made if the results are expected to be positive. If there is a risk of no positive consequences, the decision will be delayed (Cecchetto, 2018).
|
I started the job two years back. I had various options to start my career, but I chose the diversity-based organization where my friend was already working. The decision was made because I knew that working with friends and a diverse community would give me pleasure, and it will be the best decision of my life.Case Study | There are various strengths of Utilitarianism. It gives the liberty to make the decisions, and the final approach or outcome is viewed or predicted before the time. The circumstances are usually decided or predicted by the independent decision. | There are several weaknesses of the theory. It is observed that the consequences may not be personal choices. It only focuses on the outcomes and may have negative consequences in the end. |
| Kantian Ethics
|
The decision criteria are based on the principle or logic behind the action. It does not consider the consequences, but the theory deals with the logical actions that people may take. There are various ethical theories, and ethics are of various types. The Kantian ethical theory relies on the reasoning of how the situation can be handled if the logical action is taken. The consequences can be positive or negative, but the decision criteria do not consider it (Farmer, 2018).Case Study | I observed a medical fraud in the healthcare organization where I used to work. My senior was also involved in the medical fraud, and I was the witness. I tried to suppress the voice of my heart, and I wanted not to inform anyone of it, but I could not do it. I raised my voice and fulfilled my ethical duty. I complained against the involved parties and got appreciation as well. I did not think of the consequences while reporting the incident. | It is based on morals and values that show everyone is equal. Kantian Ethics has empowered everyone to think of reasons and follow moral ethics. There is another strength, and it is not to think of the future but to save the present. | It involves human beings, but the other lives also have the same rights. The morals and values fit everyone. It has been observed that the situation might not be favorable always, but the rationale is always involved. |
| Ross’s Ethics
|
The decision criteria are based on the seven factors: fidelity; reparation; gratitude, justice; benevolence; non-maleficence, and self-improvement. People should consider all these factors before making a decision (Sison, 2018). | I have to interact with several patients and always try to follow Ross’s Ethics. It is my moral duty to tell them the truth. I have made it my routine that there should be no lie with the patients, but they should always be told the truth and under clear circumstances. | There are various strengths of Ross’s ethics. The morals are not devalued. The people are encouraged to speak the truth in all circumstances. Morals should be prioritized, and it is amazing for the people. It also promotes equality. | Sometimes, it leads to following complex situations.
Personal attachments are not given much importance. The principles and morals are the priority, and it leaves everything behind. These are some weaknesses that should be considered. |
| Natural Law Ethics
|
There are four principles on which the decision is based. The action must be good enough to follow or to make a decision. The second principle is to make the action before thinking of the circumstances. The third principle is to know that the intention is fair enough. The last reason to make the decision criteria is to understand that the action is caused by serious reasons (Duboz, 2018). | I have decided to do the job in the healthcare organization because of natural law ethics. I have a good experience with this type of ethics. I have followed all four principles and have tried to maintain the dignity of all the actions taken in my career.Case Study | The focus is on the action instead of predictions.
The intention is always good regardless of the consequences The severe nature of work is already determined. |
The consequences are often ignored.
It only focuses on severe consequences. The morals and values do not consider happiness. |
References
Cecchetto, C., Korb, S., Rumiati, R. I., & Aiello, M. (2018). Emotional reactions in moral decision-making are influenced by empathy and alexithymia. Social Neuroscience, 13(2), 226-240.
Farmer, Y. (2018). Ethical decision making and reputation management in public relations. Journal of Media Ethics, 33(1), 2-13.
Sison, A. J. G. (2018). Virtue ethics and natural law responses to human rights difficulties in business. Business and Human Rights Journal, 3(2), 211-232.Case Study
Duboz, R., Echaubard, P., Promburom, P., Kilvington, M., Ross, H., Allen, W., … & Binot, A. (2018). Systems thinking in practice: participatory modeling as a foundation for integrated approaches to health. Frontiers in veterinary science, 5, 303.
