Case Study essay paper

Written assignment:

Poor (1)

Fair (2)

Good (3)

Excellent (4)

Score

Identified all problems of the patient accurately

Did not identify problems accurately on 5-6  occasions

Did not identify problems accurately on 3-4 occasions

Identified all problems, but did not identify problems accurately on 1-2 occasions

Identified all problems accurately

Methods/Interventions

Listed methods used to treat patient in a comprehensive list to be used as treatment plan guide. Indicate FOR (s) for treatment session.

Information provided is vague.

Methodology is not comprehensiveand lacking information.

Good, but additional clarification needed.

Comprehensive list of methods that will be used in intervention. Sound, research basedmethodology is evident FOR (s) is indicated.

Rationale/Justification

Describes the rationale behind above methods and gives reason Case Study why this will work (justification)

Unacceptableperformance and clinical reasoning

Rationale is missing or not sound on several methods

Good, but rationale is incomplete or not sound on some methods

Sound rationale given for each method. Comprehensive.

Created and developed two treatment sessions  utilizing time management skills and progression in the treatment continuum

Did not createand develop treatment sessions  accurately and correctly

Creation and development treatment of sessions requireadditional work. Uses clinical reasoning skills for 50% of session

Good overall. Additional clarification required. Most ideas are good and uses clinical reasoning skills for 75% of session

Created and developed two treatment sessions  accurately and correctly, meeting the criteria  

Treatment session:

Description of main medical diagnosis, and any precautions.

Brief description of patient’s status and goals.

Too long or too short of expected length of time

Part of the treatment session is appropriate and addresses goals.

Most of treatment session is appropriate & addresses goals.

Medical and diagnoses information covered.  Important precautions mentioned. Brief discussion of patient’s status and goals-  

Uses and prepares equipment in the lab.

Last minute preparation with materials.

Creativity shown.

Creativity, flexibility. Demonstrates how activity can be graded.

Overview of treatments selected and why they are appropriate for this patient is indicated.

Address Q & A.

Unable to answer questions from instructor/ students Case Study related to rational or activity analysis or interventions.

Nervous, but attempts to answer questions at the end of treatment session.

Answers questions easily and somewhat accurately at the end of treatment session.

Student is able to explain and answer all questions at the end of treatment session. Shows how activities can be graded up or down. Rational is complete  

Shows creativity. At the end of the treatment session, identifies opportunity to recommend to the occupational therapist the need for referring client for reevaluation, discharge planning and additional evaluation for other services and/or professional (s).

Written activity analysis for each activity.

Vague, not well elaborated, does not address value or meaning of activity. Explanation will not contribute to analysis.

Many questions arise. Data provided is acceptable, but more effort is required.

Data provided that may assist in identifying value of activity for use in treatmentrequires minimal additional clarification.

Well discussed, provides meaningful relevant data that may assist in identifying value of activity for use in treatment

Shows progression from adjunctive to purposeful as appropriate.

Rationale and explanation of interventions.

Unacceptable.More creativity and justification required.

Many questions arise.  Rationale and explanation of interventions requires additional focus and concentration  

Progression from adjunctive to purposeful requires additional thought process.

Rationale and explanation of interventions require additional work but can be followed.  Some questions arise.

Progression from adjunctive to purposeful as appropriate.

Rationale and explanation of interventions is clearly identified.

Shows priority as related to discharge plans as appropriate.

Vague and not well elaborated.

Priority as related to discharge plans is not as evident.  Many questions arise

Priority as related to discharge plans  requires additional clarification

Priority as related to discharge plans as appropriate.

After treatment session, identification of

opportunity to

recommend to the occupational therapist the need for referring client for reevaluation and  additional evaluation for other services and/or professional (s).

Unacceptable.  Evidence of knowledge and understanding is not apparent

Identification of

opportunity to

recommend to the occupational therapist the need for referring client for reevaluation and  additionalevaluation for other services and/or professional (s) is articulated,  however, many questions arise

Identification of

opportunity to

recommend to the occupational therapist the need for referring client for reevaluation and  additionalevaluation for other services and/or professional (s) is articulated., however,knowledge and understanding is not as apparent.  Minimal clarification to increase knowledge and understanding required.

Identification of

opportunity to

recommend to the occupational therapist the need for referring client for reevaluation and  additional evaluation for other services and/or professional (s) clearly articulated.  Knowledge and understanding isevident.

Evidence based treatment: AJOT or other researched based articles are used to support one intervention.  

Copies of article included with paper.

No evidence of article or

more than 25% of the information isnot accurately transcribed.

Selection of articles are not highly relevant to case study/or is/areinsufficient.

Another article is recommended

Selected article  supports specified intervention, but  rationale requires additional clarification

Selected article  addresses specified intervention with supporting rationale provided