Case Study Patient Care Part 2 essay paper
Case Study Patient Care Part 2
Case Study Patient Care Part 2
Treatment Session
Case study review
(part 2 of 3)
Name: _____________________
Date: ______________
Course: OTA 108/109 Patient Care Procedures
Objective:
Procedure: The student will be assigned a case study with an array of physical dysfunctions. They will develop a one hour treatment session applying techniques, strategies and practices discussed in class. This is the second part of the student training in electronic documentation as well because they must search, read,and review the evaluation from the case study.
Case Study Patient Care Part 2
Curriculum Threads addressed:
Evaluation:
|
Criteria |
Poor (1) |
Fair (2) |
Good (3) |
Excellent (4) |
Score |
|
Are the areas addressed during the Tx session a true reflection of the main and priority problem list? |
Three or more of the areas addressed during the Treatmentsession were not a true reflection of the main and priority problem list. |
Two of the areas addressed during the Treatment session were not a true reflection of the main and priority problem list. |
One of the areas addressed during the Treatment session was not a true reflection of the main and priority problem list. |
All the areas addressed during the Treatments session were a true reflection of the main and priority problem list.
|
|
|
Were the activities and exercises presented during the session congruent and related to the STGs. |
Three or more of the activities and exercises presented during the session were not congruent and related to the STGs. |
Two of the activities and exercises presented during the session were not congruent and related to the STGs. |
One of the activities and exercises presented during the session was not congruent and related to the STGs. |
All of the activities and exercises presented during the session were congruent and related to the STGs. |
|
|
Were the exercises, activities and techniques used during the session correctly applied and implemented |
Three or more exercises, activities or techniques used during the session were incorrectly applied and implemented |
Two exercises, activities or techniques used during the session were incorrectly applied and implemented |
One exercise, activity or techniques used during the session was incorrectly applied and implemented |
All the exercises, activities and techniques used during the session were correctly applied and implemented
|
|
|
Were the exercises, activities and techniques used during the session explained clearly and properly to the patient/caregiver/family/significant other? |
Three or more of the exercises, activities and techniques used during the session were not explained clearly and properly |
Two of the exercises, activities and techniques used during the session were not explained clearly and properly |
One of the exercises, activities and techniques used during the session was not explained clearly and properly |
All of the exercises, activities and techniques used during the session were explained clearly and properly |
|
|
Was the interaction and communication with patient/caregiver/family/significant other carried out with respect and professionalism, with evidence of therapeutic use of self |
The interaction and Case Study Patient Care Part 2communication with the patient was carried out with respect and professionalism on few occasionswith no evidence of therapeutic use of self |
The interaction and communication with the patient was carried out with respect and professionalism sometimes with limited evidence of therapeutic use of self |
The interaction and communication with the patient was carried out with respect and professionalism most of the timewith evidence of therapeutic use of self |
The interaction and communication with the patient was carried out with respect and professionalism at all times with evidence of therapeutic use of self |
|
|
Did the therapist provide adequate and timely feedback to the patient that led to the desired response |
The therapist provided inadequate and untimely feedback to the patient that led to an undesired response |
The therapist provided adequate and timely feedback to the patient that led to the desired response, on occasion |
The therapist provided adequate and timely feedback to the patient that led to the desired response most of the time |
The therapist provided adequate and timely feedback to the patient that led to the desired response at all time |
|
|
Did the therapist apply safety measures and techniques while treating the patient |
The therapist did not apply safety measures and techniques while treating the patient three or more times |
The therapist did not apply safety measures and techniques while treating the patient twice |
The therapist did not apply safety measures and techniques while treating the patient once |
The therapist applied safety measures and techniques while treating the patient at all times |
|
|
Did the therapist integrate opportunity to discuss with the patient/caregiver/family/significant other prevention, health maintenance and health promotion |
The therapist did not integrate appropriately or at all, opportunity to discuss with the patient/caregiver/family/significant other prevention, health maintenance and health promotion |
The therapist integrated appropriately, opportunity to discuss with the patient/caregiver/family/significant other prevention, health maintenance and health promotion, on occasion |
The therapist integrated appropriately, opportunity to discuss with the patient/caregiver/family/significant other prevention, health maintenance and health promotion most of the time |
The therapist integrated appropriately, opportunity to discuss with the patient/caregiver/family/significant other prevention, health maintenance and health promotion |
|
|
Did the therapist project confidence with full domain and control while offering the treatment session? |
The therapist did not project confidence with full domain and control of the treatment session |
The therapist projected confidence with full domain and control of the treatment session sometimes |
The therapist projected confidence with full domain and control of the treatment session most of the times |
The therapist projected confidence with full domain and control of the treatment session at all times
|
|
|
Did the therapist integrate opportunity to discuss with the patient/caregiver/family/significant other the need to possibly integrate interprofessional team dynamics for planning, delivering and evaluating care? |
The therapist did not integrate appropriately or at all, opportunity to discuss with the patient/caregiver/family/significant other |
The therapist integrated appropriately, opportunity to discuss with the patient/caregiver/family/significant other |
The therapist integrated appropriately, opportunity to discuss with the patient/caregiver/family/significant other most of the time |
The therapist integrated appropriately, opportunity to discuss with the patient/caregiver/family/significant otherCase Study Patient Care Part 2 |
|
Comments:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Instructor Signature:____________________________________________________________
ACOTE Standards for an Accredited Educational Program for the Occupational Therapy Assistant:
B.1.4., B.3.4., B.3.7, B.4.3., B.4.9, B.4.10., B.4.11., B.4.13. ,B.4.21., B.4.25
Revised 07/09/2020 JM
