Legal Relationships Essay

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Write an analysis (1,250-2,000 words) on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), as it applies to contracts. Discussion should include the following:

1. The history of the UCC from the development of the UCC to its current use, citing changes and modifications made since adoption.
2. The current use of the UCC. You must address a minimum of two articles of the UCC.
3. The parties and types of contracts that may be covered by the UCC.

Use the readings from the course and seek out additional information to support your discussion. You should utilize at least three relevant scholarly sources in support of your analysis. Be sure to cite two or more of these sources in each prompt of the essay.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Topic 3 Gleim Quiz

Assessment Description

Complete the Topic 3 Gleim Quiz by logging on to the Gleim.com website.

 

The quizzes are found in your “Personal Classroom” of the Gleim system.

 

Enter the “Access Professor-led Courses” and select the appropriate course under the option for assessment quizzes. Legal Relationships Essay

 

Complete the BUS-623, Topic 3 Quiz.

 

This quiz is 20 multiple choice questions. You may attempt the Topic 3 Quiz only once. You will have 60 minutes to complete the quiz.

 

You may complete all the study steps available for the Gleim system. However, only your quiz results will be recorded in the gradebook.

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

https://www.gleim.com

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

 

Legal Relationships Essay

Write an analysis (1,250-2,000 words) on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), as it applies to contracts. Discussion should include the following:

1. The history of the UCC from the development of the UCC to its current use, citing changes and modifications made since adoption.
2. The current use of the UCC. You must address a minimum of two articles of the UCC.
3. The parties and types of contracts that may be covered by the UCC.

Use the readings from the course and seek out additional information to support your discussion. You should utilize at least three relevant scholarly sources in support of your analysis. Be sure to cite two or more of these sources in each prompt of the essay.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Legal Relationships Essay

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Topic 3 DQ 2

Assessment Description

On July 1, Mega Bank attaches and perfects a security interest in all of the Imagine, Inc.’s present and after-acquired equipment. On July 15, Fun Co. sells and delivers a new toy manufacturing machine to Imagine, Inc. Fun Co. attaches a security interest in the machine on July 16 and perfects it by filing on July 17. What is the general priority rule established by the Uniform Commercial Code? Which security interest has priority and why? How does the Uniform Commercial Code help or hurt business transactions such as the one presented here? What if Imagine, Inc. has not paid for the toy manufacturing machine and files for bankruptcy on August 15th?  Who will be deemed the secured creditor, Mega Bank or Fun Co.?

 

 

Support your positions and provide citations for all outside sources used to develop and defend your position

 

To participate in follow-up discussion, choose a topic from the Uniform Commercial Code – Article 2 – Sales and summarize how that Part of Article 2 helps or hurts business transactions such as the one presented here and compare your response to that of a classmate.

 

Follow-up discussions to classmates’ initial responses should integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject; offer a personal observation or experience; reference real-world examples, current events; or present current research on the topic that encourages further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class.

Topic 3 DQ 1

Assessment Description

View the case study “Agency: Duped by Duplication” in You Be the Judge. After you receive the judge’s decision on this case, review Chapter 35 of the textbook. Provide an analysis of apparent authority and termination of an agency relationship. What are the factors to consider for apparent authority? Was apparent authority established in this matter? If Mr. Herran chooses to terminate his assistant’s authority to act as his agent, what steps would Mr. Herran need to undertake? Legal Relationships Essay

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Cite any external sources that were not part of the interactive exercise.  Your initial post should include your analysis and evidence from other cases that supports your analysis. Your follow-up discussion should challenge your classmates’ findings and defend your own position. Follow-up discussions to classmates’ initial responses should integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject; offer a personal observation or experience; reference real-world examples, current events; or present current research on the topic that encourages further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class.

 

Topic 2 Gleim Quiz

 

Assessment Description

Complete the Topic 2 Gleim Quiz by logging on to the Gleim.com website.

The quizzes are found in your “Personal Classroom” of the Gleim system.

Enter the “Access Professor-led Courses” and select the appropriate course under the option for assessment quizzes.

Complete the BUS-623, Topic 2 Quiz.

This quiz is 20 multiple choice questions. You may attempt the Topic 2 Quiz only once. You will have 60 minutes to complete the quiz.

You may complete all the study steps available for the Gleim system. However, only your quiz results will be recorded in the gradebook.

https://www.gleim.com

 

Topic 2 DQ 2

 

Assessment Description

View the case study “Verbal Agreement: Recording Studio Blues” in You Be the Judge. In this matter the court has ruled that there was not a contract due to the lack of the meeting of the minds. Specifically, the defendant had not agreed to the payment terms. What if the plaintiff had followed his customary business practice and retained the master tapes until payment had been made? Would this have altered the court’s decision? What steps should the plaintiff have taken when the contract was initiated to ensure the contract was effective?

Your initial post should include evidence from other cases that support your decision. Cite any external sources that were not part of the interactive exercise. Your follow-up discussion should challenge your classmates’ findings and defend your own position. Follow-up discussions to classmates’ initial responses should integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject; offer a personal observation or experience; reference real-world examples, current events; or present current research on the topic that encourages further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class. Legal Relationships Essay

Topic 2 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Review Standard Bent Glass v. Glassrobots, 333 F.3d 440 (3rd. Cir. 2003). What about this transaction provides support for the applicability of the arbitration clause?  Does the Statute of Frauds apply to this transaction?  Why or why not?  Post your completed response to the case in the main forum.

 

Your initial post should include evidence from other cases (not Standard Bent Glass v. Glassrobots) that support your decision. Your follow-up discussion should challenge your classmates’ findings and defend your own position. Follow-up discussions to classmates’ initial responses should integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject; offer a personal observation or experience; reference real-world examples, current events; or present current research on the topic that encourage further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class.

Topic 1 Gleim Quiz

Assessment Description

Complete the Topic 1 Gleim Quiz by logging on to the Gleim.com website.

 

The quizzes are found in your “Personal Classroom” of the Gleim system.

 

Enter the “Access Professor-led Courses” and select the appropriate course under the option for assessment quizzes.

 

Complete the BUS-623, Topic 1 Quiz.

 

This quiz is 20 multiple choice questions. You may attempt the Topic 1 Quiz only once. You will have 60 minutes to complete the quiz.

 

You may complete all the study steps available for the Gleim system. However, only your quiz results will be recorded in the gradebook.

 

https://www.gleim.com

Topic 1 DQ 2

 

Assessment Description

What are the differences in whether a limited liability company is member-managed or manager-managed? Does the election of one form of management create a difference in the fiduciary duties of members of a limited liability company? Explain your answer. Legal Relationships Essay

Be sure to provide citations for all referenced material. Your initial post should include your decision, your reasons for the decision, and evidence that supports your decision. In a follow-up discussion, provide two reasons for why you would recommend a member-managed or manager-managed LLC to a client and compare your recommendations to those of a classmate. Follow-up discussions to classmates’ initial responses should integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject; offer a personal observation or experience; reference real-world examples, current events; or present current research on the topic that encourages further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class.

Topic 1 DQ 1

 

Assessment Description

View the case study “Partnerships: You Sunk My Partnership” in You Be the Judge. After you receive the judge’s decision on this case, review the Revised Uniform Partnership Agreement (RUPA) where the parties do not have a written partnership agreement. Specifically, review the sections addressing division of assets and liabilities.

Provide an analysis of division of partnership assets under RUPA when there is not a written partnership agreement. How should the assets be divided? How should paintings and other artwork created before the formation of the partnership be divided?

Cite any external sources that were not part of the interactive exercise. Your initial post should include your analysis and evidence from other cases that supports your analysis. Your follow-up discussion should challenge your classmates’ findings and defend your own position. Follow-up discussions to classmates’ initial responses should integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject; offer a personal observation or experience; reference real-world examples, current events; or present current research on the topic that encourages further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class. Legal Relationships Essay

 

Government Regulation of Business Essay

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Write an analysis (2,000-2,500 words) regarding the regulation of financial reporting, as established through the Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) auditing standards effective December 31, 2016. Discussion should include the following:

1. Summarize the main points for the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
2. Compare the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
3. Summarize at least two sections of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
4. Discuss the most recent changes of the PCAOB General Auditing Standards as they apply to GAAP reporting. Do not discuss the audit procedures or reporting.
5. Include a discussion of how the regulation of the accounting industry has changed since 1933 using these four regulations/standards as a timeline. Government Regulation of Business Essay

Use readings from the course and seek out additional information to support your discussion. A possible resource is the PCAOB website at https://pcaobus.org (click on the Standards menu item). Include at least three external relevant scholarly sources to support your points. Be sure to cite two or more of these sources in each prompt of the essay.

Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Topic 6 DQ 2

Assessment Description

What were two common traits that were seen in the corporate scandals of 2002, such as Enron and WorldCom? How can a corporation improve its corporate governance and corporate responsibility? Discuss how Sarbanes-Oxley has improved financial reporting by summarizing a portion of the law and why you think that specific requirement has made financial reporting better.

Support your positions and provide citations for all outside sources used to develop and defend your position.

To participate in follow-up discussion, discuss how Sarbanes-Oxley has improved financial reporting by summarizing a portion of the law and why you think that specific requirement has made financial reporting better. Compare your response with a classmate and respectively disagree.

Follow-up discussions to classmates’ initial responses should integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject; offer a personal observation or experience; reference real-world examples, current events; or present current research on the topic that encourages further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class. Government Regulation of Business Essay

Topic 6 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Find a journal article online about the effectiveness of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In the subject line of your post, include the name of the article that you read. Post a link to that article with your initial post, and provide a summary and a reaction to the article. The summary should describe the major points of the article, and the reaction should demonstrate your interpretation of the article and how you can apply that knowledge in the workplace. Specifically, identify whether you think that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is effective or ineffective, and why.

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Do not choose an article about which one of your classmates has already posted.

Support your positions and provide citations for all outside sources used to develop and defend your position. To participate in follow-up discussion, choose one of the articles about which a classmate has posted, and provide your own reaction to it. Follow-up discussions to classmates’ initial responses should integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject; offer a personal observation or experience; reference real-world examples, current events; or present current research on the topic that encourages further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class.

Topic 5 Gleim Quiz

 

Assessment Description

Complete the Topic 5 Gleim Quiz by logging on to the Gleim.com website.

The quizzes are found in your “Personal Classroom” of the Gleim system.

Enter the “Access Professor-led Courses” and select the appropriate course under the option for assessment quizzes.

Complete the BUS-623, Topic 5 Quiz.

This quiz is 20 multiple choice questions. You may attempt the Topic 5 Quiz only once. You will have 60 minutes to complete the quiz.

You may complete all the study steps available for the Gleim system. However, only your quiz results will be recorded in the gradebook.

https://www.gleim.com

 

Topic 5 DQ 2

Assessment Description

On May 23, the plaintiff purchased a new car from her local dealer. The automobile was covered by both a limited warranty and a vehicle service contract (extended warranty). Following delivery, the plaintiff advised the salesperson that she had noted numerous problems with the vehicle, including the brakes and transmission, as well as cosmetic issues related to the paint job. When the brakes failed, the car was returned to the dealer for the necessary repairs. When the car was returned to the plaintiff, she discovered that the brakes had not been properly repaired and that none of the cosmetic work had been done. The car was returned several times to the dealer to correct these problems and others that developed.  Government Regulation of Business Essay.Within a few months of the purchase, the car was again returned to the dealer for repairs. The car remained at the dealer for several weeks. When the car was returned, the plaintiff noticed that all of the defects had not been corrected; however, the plaintiff accepted the vehicle. In the next few months the plaintiff had more problems with the vehicle. After several months and repeated efforts to repair the car, the plaintiff sent a letter to the dealer calling for rescission of the purchase, requesting return of the purchase price, and offering to return the car on receipt of shipping instructions. She received no answer and continued to drive the car. The plaintiff had no contact with the dealer for several months when she filed suit. At that time, the vehicle had been driven 12,000 miles. By the time of the trial, one year later, the car had been driven 35,000 miles.

By continuing to operate the vehicle after notifying the seller of her intent to rescind the sale, did the plaintiff waive her right to revoke her original acceptance? What instructions, if any, did the seller tender the buyer concerning return of the now rejected goods? What if the non-conformity can be completely cured pursuant to available warranties?  Was the seller unduly prejudiced by the buyer’s continued use?

Your initial post should include your decision, your reasons for the decision, and evidence that supports your decision. Support your positions and provide citations for all outside sources used to develop and defend your position. Your follow-up discussion should challenge your classmates’ findings and defend your own position. Follow-up discussions to classmates’ initial responses should integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject; offer a personal observation or experience; reference real-world examples, current events; or present current research on the topic that encourages further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class.

Topic 5 DQ 1

Assessment Description

View the case study “Warranty: Who Is Distorting What?” in You Be the Judge. After you receive the judge’s decision on this case, review Chapter 20 of the textbook. What is the distinction between an implied warranty of merchantability and an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose? Which warranty did the plaintiff breach in this matter?

Your initial post should include your analysis and evidence from other cases that supports your analysis. Cite any external sources that were not part of the interactive exercise. Your follow-up discussion should challenge your classmates’ findings and defend your own position. Follow-up discussions to classmates’ initial responses should integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject; offer a personal observation or experience; reference real-world examples, current events; or present current research on the topic that encourages further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class. Government Regulation of Business Essay

Benchmark – Ethics Case Study

Assessment Traits

Benchmark

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

For this assignment, you are to select an article from a peer-reviewed journal (such as the Journal of Accountancy) that discusses one instance of occupational fraud. The best place to locate peer-reviewed articles is through the GCU Library. Refer to “Writing Case Studies” to help you prepare your response for the case study.

The paper is to be focused on one instance of occupational fraud.

Based on the article, compose a case study (1,500-1,800 words) detailing the following:

The facts of the article (key details).

The individuals involved.

What went wrong with the organization’s system of internal controls that allowed this fraud to happen? What ethical dilemmas were involved? Benchmark – Ethics Case Study

How was the issue discovered? Explain.

What internal controls might have prevented or detected the fraud had they been in place? Remember to support with relevant resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:

M.S. Accounting

4.1: Demonstrate an understanding of the general business environment and business concepts including knowledge of corporate governance.

Writing Case Studies:

A Guide to ACC-667 Written Assignments

Documentation of Sources

This is a resource to help you prepare responses to the case study assignment. Case Study assignments are not simply a review of the article but required outside resources to support your conclusions. Benchmark – Ethics Case Study

The assignment includes five components:

1.A summary of the facts of the article. This would be similar to a book report where you provide the details in the article in summary format. Be sure to properly cite your sources.

2.Discussion of the individuals involved.

3.A discussion about what went wrong.

4.How the issues were discovered.

5.Recommendations for the internal controls that may have prevented or detected the fraud had they been in place.

For the last item, you must use outside resources to support your recommendations or support for how internal controls would have detected the fraud. You will need to utilize the GCU library to find sources to support your recommendations and evidence your understanding of the application to the case.

ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

Before you start writing:

• Read the article and take notes, highlight facts, and determine key issues
• Focus on the fraud, how did it happen, who was involved, what controls were already in place
• Research using the library to find relevant articles based on internal controls that may apply to your facts and circumstances or similar articles

The Topic 4 assignment is an investigation and is similar in approach to the Topic 1 case study. You will need to locate external resources to support your points and recommendations

 

 

 

Topic 2 DQ 1

Assessment Description

The fraud detection process involves different tools and methods. Describe a tool or method that is used in fraud detection. Explain why you believe this tool or method is the most beneficial. Comment on another classmate’s post who has a different perspective and offer your opinion in a respectful way. Benchmark – Ethics Case Study

Topic 2 DQ 2

Assessment Description

Fraud in the digital world is growing at a rapid pace. Discuss the term digital fraud/cybercrime and describe two types of digital fraud/cybercrime. How can a company protect itself from digital fraud?  Discuss at least two internal controls that a company could put in place to safeguard themselves. Try to identify internal controls that have not yet been posted by another student. In your responses, identify similarities and differences between the information provided in your post and the post of your classmate.

Fraud Triangle Assignment

 

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

For this assignment, you are to construct a diagram of the Fraud Triangle and clearly label each component of the Fraud Triangle. For each of these three components, provide the following:

An explanation (two to three paragraphs) of each of the three components, specifically addressing how it could contribute to fraud.

For each component of the Fraud Triangle, provide the following:

List and briefly discuss internal controls for each of the three components that could help to reduce the impact of potential frauds related to that component of the Fraud Triangle.

Note: This means that you will have a total of 24 internal controls documented. A few of the internal controls might be common to each component but please tailor them to the component you are referring to and do not copy and paste the same eight internal controls for each component.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Benchmark – Ethics Case Study

 

 

Benchmark – Fraud Case Study

Assessment Traits

Benchmark

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

For this assignment, you are to research the Internet and select a fraud that was reported in the last 2 years. Refer to “Writing Case Studies” to help you prepare your response for the case study.

Design an investigation (1,500-1,750 words) based on the information reported and provide the following:

1. Brief introduction including the facts of the case. The background of the case should comprise a small portion of your overall assignment.
2. Discuss the types of evidence (documentary, etc.) you would look for in this type of case. This discussion should include how an audit may or may not be helpful in locating fraud and what type of evidence may have been found during an audit that signaled fraud may be occurring.
3. Identify how, as a certified public accountant, you may locate fraud during an attest engagement or during the preparation or review of financial reports.
4. Discuss the methods you would use to catalog and maintain the evidence including the concept of having a chain of custody of evidence. Benchmark – Fraud Case Study
5. Prepare a conclusion that includes how you would organize and present the evidence when the case is completed as a forensic accountant.
6. What tax laws could your case be trying to circumvent?

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:

MS Accounting

4.4: Apply that knowledge in performing audit, attest, financial reporting, tax preparation, and other professional responsibilities as certified public accountants.

Writing Case Studies:

A Guide to ACC-667 Written Assignments

Documentation of Sources

This is a resource to help you prepare responses to the case study assignment. Case Study assignments are not simply a review of the article but required outside resources to support your conclusions.

The assignment includes five components:

1.A summary of the facts of the article. This would be similar to a book report where you provide the details in the article in summary format. Be sure to properly cite your sources.

2.Discussion of the individuals involved.

3.A discussion about what went wrong.

4.How the issues were discovered.

5.Recommendations for the internal controls that may have prevented or detected the fraud had they been in place.

For the last item, you must use outside resources to support your recommendations or support for how internal controls would have detected the fraud. You will need to utilize the GCU library to find sources to support your recommendations and evidence your understanding of the application to the case.

Before you start writing:

• Read the article and take notes, highlight facts, and determine key issues
• Focus on the fraud, how did it happen, who was involved, what controls were already in place
• Research using the library to find relevant articles based on internal controls that may apply to your facts and circumstances or similar articles
  

  ORDER   A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER   NOW

The Topic 4 assignment is an investigation and is similar in approach to the Topic 1 case study. You will need to locate external resources to support your points and recommendations. Benchmark – Fraud Case Study

Topic 4 DQ 2

 

Assessment Description

Discuss the five types of interview and interrogation questions that might be used by a fraud examiner. Pick one of the five types of interrogation questions and discuss a situation in which it might be more beneficial for the fraud examiner to use that type of questioning. In your response to classmates, respectfully disagree with their position and state why your position is more conducive.

 

 

Topic 4 DQ 1

 

Assessment Description

Discuss the difference between direct evidence and circumstantial evidence and provide an example of each type of evidence. Which type of evidence is more persuasive in a court of law? In response to your classmates, compare the examples and value of the evidence discussed in your post to your classmate’s post. Is one type of evidence easier to obtain versus the other?

Topic 3 Gleim Quiz

 

Assessment Description

Complete the Topic 3 Gleim Quiz by logging on to the Gleim.com website.

The quizzes are found in your “Personal Classroom” of the Gleim system.

Enter the “Access Professor-led Courses” and select the appropriate course under the option for assessment quizzes.

Complete the ACC-667, Topic 3 quiz.

You may complete all the study steps available for the Gleim system.  However, only your quiz results will be recorded in the gradebook. Benchmark – Fraud Case Study

www.Gleim.com

 

Case study

Assessment Description

For this assignment, you are to prepare detailed responses to the cases in the textbook (Chapter 9 “Case T. Account Analysis” and Chapter 11 “Chart & Graphical Presentation – Keystone Case” including parts I & II). Support your conclusions with relevant resources. Remember to show all your work in the file. Put both problems into one file for submission. Be sure to provide ample evidence in support of your responses by applying course concepts and referencing relevant resources where appropriate.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

 

Topic 3 DQ 2

Assessment Description

Where might fraud examiners and forensic accountants find data during a fraud investigation? Identify an ethical conundrum that may arise in the collection of data. In your responses, identify how you would respond to the ethical conundrum presented by your classmate.

Topic 3 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Be sure to answer all questions:

• When approaching an investigation, what are the challenges an investigator faces with providing evidence of intent on the part of the fraudster?
• What constitutes evidence for an investigation?
• Compare the four types of evidence often presented in a case.

In your responses, comment on a classmate’s perspective of challenges when providing evidence of the intent on the part of the fraudster. How would you manage this challenge differently? Benchmark – Fraud Case Study