Research essay paper
Research
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Research essay paper
Just from $15/Page
Article Citation (APA Format): (3 pts and MUST post article)Research
|
|||||||||
Research Question:
(1pt) |
|||||||||
Hypotheses (if any):
(1pt) |
|||||||||
Setting:
(1pt) |
|
Sample Size: (1pt) | |||||||
Population:
(1pt) |
|||||||||
Intervention (if any):
(1pt) |
|||||||||
Research Design: (1pt) | ☐ Descriptive | ☐ Correlational | ☐ Quasi-experimental | ☐ Experimental | ☐ Other (state what it is)
|
||||
Strength of Study Design (14pts) | Explain Response (cite page in article if appropriate) | ||||||||
● Was the sample size adequate and appropriate? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Were study participants randomly assigned to experimental and control groups? Were the subjects, and/or the providers blind to the study group? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Were reasons given to explain why subjects did not complete the study? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Was there an intervention? Describe. | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● If there was more than one group, were groups equally treated, except for the intervention? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Was there adequate description of the data collection methods? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Were the instruments used to measure the outcomes valid and reliable? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
Theoretical Framework and Literature Review (8 pts)Research | Explain Response (cite page in article if appropriate) | ||||||||
● Was there a theoretical framework used to guide the study? Describe. | ☐Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Does the literature review identify what is known and not known about the research problem? | ☐Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Does the literature review address gaps in knowledge? | ☐Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Was the research reviewed within the literature review current (within the last 5 years or classic)? | ☐Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
Study Results (8 pts)Research | Explain Response (cite page in article if appropriate) | ||||||||
● Were the statistical tests used identified? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Were results clearly presented? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Were all clinically important outcomes measured (including any adverse reactions)? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Was an interpretation/analysis provided? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
Study Conclusions (8 pts) | Explain Response (cite page in article if appropriate) | ||||||||
● Were conclusion based on clearly presented results? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Were study limitations identified and discussed? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Are risks and benefits of the treatment/conclusions identified? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
● Is the treatment feasible in my clinical setting/are the findings useful to my practice? | ☐ Yes | ☐ No | |||||||
Your Bottom-Line Conclusion from Your Appraisal (2 pts) | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
Note: Adaptation of The Johns Hopkins University Evidence Appraisal Tool and the 2005 Fineout-Overholt & Melynk Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist