|
1
Not Present
0.00% |
2
Does Not Meet Expectations
74.00% |
3
Approaching Meeting Expectations
87.00% |
4
Meets Expectations
100.00% |
| 74.0 %Content |
|
| 5.0 %Chapter 3: INTRODUCTION: This section incorporates a summary of the project focus and purpose statement to reintroduce the reader to the need for the project. Clinical questions (in narrative format) and an outline of the expectations for this chapter also are included. (3-4 sentences from Chapter 1). |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 10.0 %Chapter 3: PROJECT METHODOLOGY: This section describes the research methodology for the project (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed) and explains the rationale for selecting this particular methodology. It also describes why this methodology was selected as opposed to the alternative methodologies. |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 10.0 %Chapter 3: PROJECT DESIGN: This section includes a detailed description of, and rationale for, the specific design for the project and describes how it aligns to the selected methodology indicated in the previous section. It explains exactly how the selected design will be used to collect data for each variable, or how the selected design will be used to collect data to describe the nature of the phenomena in detail. It identifies the specific instruments and data sources to be used to collect all of the different data required for the project. This section expands on the Nature of the Project Design section in Chapter 1. (1-2 pages ) |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 5.0 %Chapter 3: POPULATION AND SAMPLE SELECTION: This section discusses the setting, total population, project population, and project sample. The discussion of the sample includes the research terminology specific to the type of sampling for the project as well as how the sample population and final sample will be protected. This section provides a detailed description of the population and sample that were identified in the Project Design for the Study section in Chapter 1, as well as project considerations relevant to the sample and population. (1-2 pages) |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 5.0 %Chapter 3: INSTRUMENTATION OR SOURCES OF DATA: This section identifies and describes the types of data that will be collected as well as the specific instruments and sources used to collect the data. For quantitative studies, it also describes the specific type of scale of measurement used in an instrument or used to define the different groups. (1-3 pages) |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 2.5 %Chapter 3: VALIDITY: This section describes and defends the procedures used to determine the validity of the data collected. (2-4 paragraphs or approximately 1 page in length) |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 2.5 %Chapter 3: RELIABILITY: This section describes and defends the procedures used to determine the reliability of the data collected. (2-4 paragraphs or approximately 1 page) |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 10.0 %Chapter 3: DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES: This section details the entirety of the process used to collect the data. It describes each step of the data collection process in a way that another researcher could replicate the project. (1-3 pages in length) |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 10.0 %Chapter 3: DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURES: This section describes how the data was collected for each variable or group (quantitative project) or for each project question (qualitative project). It describes the type of data to be analyzed, identifying the descriptive, inferential, or nonstatistical analyses. Demonstrates that the project analysis is aligned to the specific project design. (1-3 pages in length) |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 5.0 %Chapter 3: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: This section discusses the potential ethical issues surrounding the project as well as how human subjects and data will be protected. It identifies how any potential ethical issues will be addressed. (3-4 paragraphs or approximately 1 page. |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 5.0 %Chapter 3: LIMITATIONS: This section discusses in detail the limitations related to the project approach and methodology and the potential impacts on the results. |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 5.0 %Chapter 3: SUMMARY: This section restates what was written in Chapter 3 and provides supporting citations for key points. It then provides a transition discussion to Chapter 4. |
Item is not present. |
Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. |
Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. |
| 15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
| 15.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| 11.0 %Format |
|
| 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
| 11.0 %Format |
|
| 6.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| 100 %Total Weightage |
|
