Charges Of A Criminal Justice Practitioner Charged With Ethics Violation

Charges Of A Criminal Justice Practitioner Charged With Ethics Violation

Write an essay below about a criminal justice practitioner who has been charged with ethics violations (this will take some research on your part). This could be a police officer abusing his/her discretion, a judge accused of taking bribes, excessive use of force by a corrections officer, etc. Outline the charges and explain the issues in terms of the ethics associated with the criminal justice system. To ensure that you earn all possible points, please refer to the course syllabus for the writing assignment criteria.

Criminal Justice is a scientific discipline and those who teach, research, study, administer or practice in this discipline subscribe to the general tenets of science and scholarship. They also recognize that the discovery, creation, transmission, and accumulation of knowledge in any scientific discipline involve ethical considerations at every level.

A criminal justice practitioner should be committed to enhancing the general well-being of society and the individuals and groups within it. They are careful to avoid incompetent, unethical or illegal use of criminal justice knowledge. They recognize the great potential for harm associated with the study of criminal justice, and they do not knowingly place the well-being of themselves or other people in jeopardy in their professional work. Charges Of A Criminal Justice Practitioner Charged With Ethics Violation.

Criminal justice practitioners respect the rights, dignity, and worth of all people. The value of people gives them the right to demand that information about them remain confidential. In their work, they are particularly careful to respect the rights, dignity, and worth of criminal justice personnel, crime victims and those accused or convicted of committing crimes, as well as of students and research subjects. They do not discriminate by age, gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, health condition or private status. They are sensitive to individual, cultural and role differences among peoples. They acknowledge the rights of other people and groups to hold values, attitudes, and opinions that are different from their own. Members of the criminal justice system should be honest and open in their professional dealings with others. They are committed to the free and open access to knowledge, to the public discourse of findings, and the sharing of the sources of those findings whenever possible. They ought not to make false, misleading or deceptive statements in their professional responsibilities. Individually, they do not knowingly present false, deceptive or misleading enlightenments of their own or other people’s professional work for any reason. They should be competent and recognize the limits of their expertise. Also, undertake only those tasks for which they qualified by education, training, and experience.

Concerning the press release of ethical violation of justice department Attorneys which involve unethical behavior in the Criminal Justice field, is caused by corruption within the system. The article, “Hundreds of Justice Department Attorneys Violated Professional Rules, Laws, or Ethical Standards” describes, “an internal affairs office at the Justice Department has realized that, in the last decade, hundreds of federal prosecutors and other Justice employees violated rules, laws, or ethical standards governing their work.”

Violations identified include the misleading and withholding of court evidence to help defendants, the abuse of prosecutorial and investigative power, and the violation of constitutional rights. These violations are categorized as “recklessness or intentional misconduct,” and at most very severe.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

The investigation was conducted between 2002 and 2013 and was under investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). The reasoning for the criminal justice agency’s involvement was determining the allegations brought forth by federal attorneys which misled courts. Also, the failure of federal prosecutors to provide exculpatory information to defendants, the violation of constitutional or civil rights, the abuse of investigative or prosecutorial authority or misconduct, the abuse on the grand jury by prosecutors, and “overzealous prosecution.”

Specific questions arose to determine the clearness during the investigation and which at one point became challenging to answer.  However, OPR determined intentional wrongdoing, defined as “professional misconduct.” An example of misconduct consisted of the implication of key witnesses in a crime and the contradicting of key witness testimonies.  Charges Of A Criminal Justice Practitioner Charged With Ethics Violation

An example investigation provided by OPR described the following:

• A DOJ attorney was assigned a criminal case with 15 months remaining under the statute of limitations, the amount of time the government is given by law to file charges. He allowed the “clear and unambiguous” time limit to expire without filing charges or alerting the Department about the impending deadline so it could decide what to do. (The Department gave the DOJ attorney “a letter of admonishment”).

This type of behavior has been a critical component in decisions involving ethical pauses, which are the concerns with standards of conduct and “how I ought to act.” These standards of conduct may vary in different areas of society. Its approach is the setting standards range from cultural relativism to moral absolutism. Religion, natural law, and other forms of law show influence in shaping types of ethical standards within the understanding of ethics as essential to competent decision making in the field of criminal justice professionals and any personnel working for a criminal justice system.

In conclusion, special attention in today’s justice system is paid to the “ethical obligations, policies and laws associated with reporting misconduct by employees within the criminal justice system.” An effective anti-corruption policy would have been a palpable way to prevent ethical violations. It ought to  be adequately addressed with proper mechanisms, initiated by the misconduct of criminal justice personnel/practitioners. Formation of a commission that will help confront problems related to unethical behavior and misconduct would be a measure in the criminal justice system. Charges Of A Criminal Justice Practitioner Charged With Ethics Violation