# NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations statistics Paper

## NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations statistics Paper

“Much of the clinical research relevant to nursing explores whether a relationship exists between two patient characteristics. Understanding potentially related characteristics helps nurses better identify which physical, psychological, or demographic factors are associated with the reason for concern” (American Nurse, 2011).

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations statistics Paper
Just from \$15/Page

Photo Credit: Getty Images

In order to explore relationships among associated variables, a DNP-prepared nurse may utilize correlational research. This type of research allows for the exploration of connections and measuring of many variables. While not used to determine causality, this research can be integral in proving theory. So, when might an issue or topic need to be explored through relationships and associations?

## ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER NOW

For this Discussion, review the Learning Resources and reflect on a particular topic of interest that may benefit from a correlational study. Formulate a research question and consider your hypotheses and prediction. Reflect on the effectiveness of conducting correlational research. NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations statistics Paper

Reference:
American Nurse. (2011). Understanding correlation analysis. https://www.myamericannurse.com/understanding-correlation-analysis/

To Prepare: NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations statistics

Review this week’s Learning Resources and focus on the types of research questions that can be answered using a correlational statistic.
Brainstorm a number of healthcare delivery or nursing practice problems that could be explored using correlational statistics. Then, select one problem on which to focus for this Discussion.
Formulate a research question to address the problem and that would lead you to employ correlational statistics.
Develop a null hypothesis and alternate hypotheses.
Ask yourself: What is the expected direction of the relationship?
By Day 3 of Week 6

Post a brief description of the selected problem that you identified for the focus of this Discussion and include your research question. Be specific. Explain your null hypothesis and alternate hypotheses for your research question and identify the dependent and independent variables that you would recommend to best support the research study. Then, explain your prediction for the expected relationship (positive or negative) between the variables that you identified. Why do you think that sort of relationship will exist? What other factors might affect the outcome? Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 6

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days in one or more of the following ways:

Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
Suggest an alternative perspective based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings. NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations statistics Paper
Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.

Week 6 Discussion Rubric

ORDER NOW a one-of-a-kind top nursing paper, produced just for you by our most qualified writers. Plagiarism-free in every respect. : NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations

Post by Day 3 of Week 6 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 6

To Participate in this NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations statistics

Excellent
90–100

Good
80–89

Fair
70–79

Poor
0–69

Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations statistics Paper

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three current credible sources.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible references.

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Cited with fewer than two credible references.

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s).

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible references.

Main Posting:
Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations statistics Paper

Main Posting:
Timely and full participation

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

## ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER NOW

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main Discussion by due date.

First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

First Response:
Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English. NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations statistics Paper

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

First Response:
Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English. NURS 8201 Week 6 Discussion: Correlations statistics Paper

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_8201_Week7_Discussion_Rubric