Posts

Responses

Responses

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Response 1:

 

The price elasticity of demand is a measure of how responsive consumers are to changes in in the price of a product.  It is calculated as the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in the price of the product. If consumers are relatively sensitive to changes in the price, then percentage change in the quantity demand will be greater than the percentage change in the price of the product. This means that the absolute value of the price elasticity of demand will be greater than 1, and this is called relatively elastic demand. If consumers are relatively insensitive to changes in the price then the percentage change in the quantity demanded will be less than the percentage change in the price of the product. This means that the absolute value of the price elasticity of demand will be less than 1, and this is called relatively elastic demand. If the percentage change in the quantity demanded is exactly equal to the percentage change in the price of the product, then absolute value of the price elasticity of demand is equal to 1 and this is called unit elastic demand.

Perfectly elastic demand refers to a situation where consumers are completely sensitive to the price, which means that an increase in the price will cause the quantity demanded to fall to zero. This is represented by a horizontal demand curve, and it implies a price elasticity of demand equal to infinity. Perfectly inelastic demand refers to a situation where consumers are completely insensitive to the price, which means that an increase in the price will not change the quantity demanded at all. This is represented by a vertical demand curve, and it implies a price elasticity of demand equal to zero.

In my opinion, the demand for auto parts is likely to be relatively elastic. This means that the percentage change in the quantity demanded is likely to be greater than the percentage change in the price. The reason I suspect this is because there are many different producers of auto parts, which means that there are many different substitutes for the parts made by AutoEdge, and this would tend to make demand relatively elastic. A second reason why I think that the demand for auto parts would be relatively elastic is that auto parts can be expensive, and higher prices products tend to have more elastic demand than lower priced products, all else equal.

Response 2:

 

What Happens if AutoEdge Raises Prices and Relocates to the US?

Elasticity is a vital model in economics. It’s used to quantify how responsive demand and/or supply is in reaction to other changes in inconstant, which in our case would be price. One of the first questions that Ingrid posed was, “would consumer demand be affected by AutoEdge’s decision to raise prices and to move operations back to the United States?” Price elasticity of demand (PED) computes the reaction of demand after an adjustment in price (Pettinger, 2016).

If price elasticity of demand results being greater than 1, than the demand is considered to be price elastic. This means that an adjustment in price is commanding a larger percentage change in demand. On the other hand, in would be considered inelastic if an adjustment in prices produced a smaller percentage and a decrease in demand. If we know what our PED is, it will help to guide us in the right direction as to if we are going in the right direction of increasing our prices. If demand is elastic, profits are produced by reducing prices, but if the demand is inelastic it is gained by lowering prices (Economics Online, n.d.).

Based on my opinion I believe that the elasticity for auto parts is considered to be relatively elastic. What this means is the percentage change in the quantity demanded of a product is greater than percentage change in its price (Nitisha, n.d.). Generally, in this case consumers will decide to move over to a new brand when they see price increases, but some consumers that are loyal to the brand stay regardless of the increase in price. We have several competitors out there currently that offer cheaper pricing but not the same quality in which we offer our consumers.

It is my belief that the auto parts industry is elastic and because of this it is not recommended to increase prices because it will not be increasing revenue. If anything, I believe that by raising prices there is the potential to see significant losses in revenues altogether. However, there are still alternatives that can be done to reach such objectives. Ingrid mentioned the possibility of relocating the manufacturing operations back to the United States. If this is a decision that has already been decided on I would advise that AutoEdge use this exciting news as a marketing and advertising tool to help increase the awareness of the brand. By spending the capital to increase the brand loyalty it helps to make the demand more inelastic, while helping to generate more revenue.

Responses essay paper

Responses

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Response1
The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) clinical judgment measurement model is a tool used to assist nurses in critically thinking and forming solutions. Efficient nurses use this line of thinking while analyzing data, prioritizing hypotheses, generating solutions, and evaluating  Responsesoutcomes. Thinking back to a time when I used the steps in this model, I was actually a certified nursing assistant working with a client in assisted living. In this scenario, a coworker and I had walked in on a client with type two diabetes mellitus who was diaphoretic, shaky, confused, pale, and tachycardic. Knowing that these symptoms were concerning especially with a diagnosis of diabetes, I knew we had to intervene fast and efficiently.
Step one in the clinical judgment model begins with recognizing cues. The importance of the cue collection stage in clinical judgment and reasoning cannot be underestimated. If early subtle cues are missed, this can lead to adverse patient outcomes (Levett-Jones, 2018). The patient cues I observed in this scenario were the client’s diaphoresis, shaking, confusion, pallor, and fast heart rate. To place these observations in order of priority, I used the ABC pneumonic: (A): airway, (B): breathing, and (C): Circulation (Ignatavicius, et al., 2021). When using this method to prioritize cues, I would place them in the order of 1. Tachycardia, 2. Pallor, 3. Diaphoresis, 4. Shaking, and 5. Confusion. Responses
Step 2 in the clinical judgment model is to create and prioritize hypotheses. Based on the analysis of the given cues, I formulated three hypotheses. Since he was a type 2 diabetic, the first hypothesis I generated was that this client experiencing tachycardia, pallor, diaphoresis, shaking, and confusion was hypoglycemic. The second hypothesis I generated was that the client experiencing tachycardia, pallor, diaphoresis, shaking, and confusion was experiencing anxiety. The third hypothesis I generated was that this client experiencing tachycardia, pallor, diaphoresis, shaking, and confusion was developing dementia as he was 80 years old and has a family history of dementia and Parkinson’s disease. Responses
The third step in the clinical judgment model is prioritizing hypotheses. The two priority hypotheses I chose for this patient were hypoglycemia and anxiety. The reason I prioritized the first hypothesis is that the Identification of a hypoglycemic patient is critical due to potential adverse effects including coma and/or death (Matthew, et al., 2022). The reason I chose anxiety over dementia was that anxiety causes high cortisol levels. In moderation, cortisol can be healthy as it triggers the ‘fight or flight’ response from our central nervous system. However, when the body is exposed to high cortisol levels for extended periods of time like in cases such as anxiety, this can lead to fatigue, high blood pressure, headaches, depression, poor sleep, etc. (Premier Health, 2017).
Step 4 of the clinical judgment model is to generate solutions. In this stage, it is important to understand the priority update that needs to be made to the plan of care and priority interventions. The priority intervention for this patient was to notify the registered nurse on call, administer fruit juice or other readily absorbable carbohydrate sources, and call emergency medical services or 911. Severe hypoglycemia can be treated with intravenous (IV) dextrose followed by an infusion of glucose.  ResponsesFor conscious patients able to take oral medications, readily absorbable carbohydrate sources (such as fruit juice) should be given (Matthew, et al., 2022). Regular blood sugar checks should be implemented for this patient’s plan of care as well as regular wellness checks. Prior to this instance, they were not regularly checked on. Afterward, they had hourly checks by staff.
The last stage of the clinical judgment model is to evaluate outcomes. What went well in this situation is how quickly my coworker and I responded to the scenario. We recognized the client’s symptoms and put them together with the fact that he was diabetic. Knowing that these symptoms aligned with hypoglycemia, we took his blood sugar which was approximately 62 mg/dL. We administered cranberry juice that was in his fridge and called 911. Using the clinical judgment model, we came to the correct conclusion and potentially saved this client’s life. Understanding the steps to this model is crucial when it comes to critical thinking and providing the best outcomes for patients.

Response2
I will never forget this day. I can remember every detail of this day. It was during the noon hour, there was an overhead page. “Medical Emergency in the parking lot.” Everything after happened so fast, even though it was over a 2.5-hour period. I grabbed a wheelchair on my way out and a father and his son were in front of the door. The father stated, “he has carbon monoxide poising” several times. The son was in the truck saying, “somebody helps me I am going to die” repeatedly, and violented started to vomit. This was happening simultaneously; I was unsure who to address as this was clearly a medical emergency. I had an assumption of drug use in the patient due to his actions. As I was wheeling him into the procedure room of the clinic, several staff members joined me, and I was attempting to give them all the information I had based on the conversation in the parking lot. At this point, everyone understood that it was possible carbon monoxide poising as he was working with machinery in an enclosed space and became nauseous and became confused. Responses
Once we were in the procedure room the patient coded. We immediately began medical emergency interventions our clinic has EKG, and CPR/AED making limited what we could do for the patient. It was chaotic a cop was in and out of the room, and other staff were in and out of the room I asked several times if we should administer Narcan and was told no every time. We brought him back 3 times and he immediately coded again. This continued for about 45 minutes until the ambulance arrived. In the meantime, a helicopter was on its way to meet the ambulance and when the ambulance arrived, they were short-staffed. I climbed into the ambulance with one of the cops and one EMT member and continued to administer CPR. I somehow ended up on the ambulance once it started moving as they were short. Once parked some distance from the clinic I stayed in the ambulance and assisted with CPR while as many of his loved ones as possible, came into and stood outside of the ambulance. They kept asking the patient “why would you do this?” and sobbing and then his father said, “just stop he is not coming back, please.” I didn’t listen or respond, I just kept performing CPR. Finally, the helicopter medicine team came and called it-and we stopped CPR. I apologized to the family and left the ambulance and walked back to the clinic. On my way back I began to cry and told myself to stop. By the time I entered the clinic I composed myself and went to our huddle room out of patient and staff sight. Immediately, my nurse manager asked me if I was in the ambulance the whole time. I said “yes, they were short” to which she responded, I just want to let you know that is against policy to leave the clinic with a patient in the ambulance. What?! This was the worst experience I have ever had, and I was simply trying to save him, and I couldn’t despite desperately attempting due to extenuating circumstances. I broke out in tears and stated I would do it again even though I couldn’t save him.
After the situation, we had a debriefing to see what could have been done differently. We concluded that communication was essential in this situation because there were 2 people in the facility doing CPR for the whole period prior to the ambulance arriving (I was one of them). Then I ended up in the ambulance with some staff not knowing, due to lack of communication.
Once I returned home, I lost it. I kept running the situation over and over in my head wondering what could have been done differently to have had a different outcome. I symptom researched symptoms and treatments. I talked to two close co-workers who were involved in the situation. I couldn’t stop the thoughts or frustration of failing this patient. I understood that if I could have asked the patient questions and focused on him, I could have possibly gotten pertinent information to help him.
I feel now that while there were many instances of ineffective communication, knowing that I can use my voice to bring comfort to others in emergency situations by controlling my actions and emotions the situation in a professional manner and following through. I also learned it was not my fault CPR was not effective however, I feel I should have advocated for the patient to receive the Narcan upon presenting to the clinic. The family refused an autopsy so, we will never know the actual cause of his death. However, I did everything I could to save the patient. I learned that understanding cues, and communication is important in every situation and is essential for optimal outcomes for everyone involved.
The external clues in this scenario include the patient’s presenting symptoms, the communication from those who brought him, and the awareness that this was an emergent situation as evidenced by the preceding factors.
The internal cues in this scenario include the indication of the need for CPR/AED, and EKG Narcan from myself in order to best treat the patient. In addition, my response was to stay with the patient to continue CPR when needed when the ambulance staff was short to ensure that interventions for the patient continued.
The following hypotheses were utilized in this scenario:
The patient’s presenting symptoms are indicative of drug overdose as evidenced by confusion, vomiting, and eventual loss of consciousness. Understanding the reason for the symptoms in the patient will better equip medical staff in ADPIE.
The patient’s symptoms of loss of consciousness, pulselessness, and termination of breathing indicate medical intervention to resuscitate as evidenced by these symptoms. Understanding the priority to stabilize the patient to maintain ABCs to prevent further injury and revive the patient. Responses
Ineffective communication regarding the reason for presenting symptoms, the role of medical staff, and may have changed the outcome for the patient as evidenced by the patient succumbing to his symptoms. Proper communication will result in an optimal outcome for the patient as all aspects of care are covered through proper communication with those involved in the situation. Responses
Action and Evaluation
The ability for any medical staff to deliver Narcan to patients presenting with drug overdose symptoms should be implemented in order to reduce the risk of death to those who do not give information stating they have been using narcotics-especially in the occurrence of loss of consciousness. Evaluation should occur once the medication is administered. Basic life support measures in this scenario should continue throughout the process and remain in place if the patient is unresponsive to Narcan (dhs.org, 2022).
Understanding that CPR/AED measures should continue until the patient is revived or proper medical personnel calls for the death of the patient. Facility policy should reflect this as our duty to patient safety and advocacy should be prioritized in this scenario. Once the policy is adjusted and implemented patient safety and advocacy will prevail in more situations. If the policy cannot change staff should utilize nursing judgment and not be penalized in extreme situations for non-adherence to the policy (AHA, 2000).
Response3
Pharmacological – Some pharmacological treatment include administering epidural analgesia or administering nitrous oxide gas for pain relief. Epidurals are considered the most effective and recommended method of pain relief (Czech et al, 2018). Th\is method of pain relief had the lowest rate of pain during each stages of labour (Czech et al, 2018). There were some studies that showed an epidural has a greater risk for performing instrumental vaginal delivery (Czech et al, 2018). Some side effects include back pain, headaches, (Czech et al, 2018). There is always a chance at developing a fever due to the epidural and while being pregnant and having a fever that can increase the baby being born with poor muscle tone, breathing issues, and lower Apgar scores (Birth injury, 2022). Another method of pain delivery includes nitrous oxide gas. This method has relieved pain with no adverse foetal outcomes (Czech et al, 2018). This is also the second most common used pain relief behind the epidural, but most women have been satisfied with their experience with it (Czech et al, 2018). There was records that stated this was the worst reduction of pain during the second and third stages of labour, compared to the epidural (Czech et al, 2018). When combined with TENS or water immersion the results were better (Czech et al, 2018).
Non-pharmacological – Some non-pharmacological pain relief includes TENS and water birth or immersion. Water birth has been around for a long time, but just recently has been becoming more popular (Czech et al, 2018). During this process, the hydrostatic pressure is lower than the intraabdominal pressure, which eases the breathing and changing of positions (Czech et al, 2018). During contractions, the pelvic tissues are more elastic and flexible, which reduces the amount of pain (Czech et al, 2018). Another form of pain relief is transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or other words TENS. This is considered the most least satisfying methods, but when combined with gas control, the effects increased (Czech et al, 2018). during the first stages of labour, TENS was successful, but later stages it was minimizing or postponing the pharmacological analgesia (Czech et al, 2018).
Response4
Pharmacological interventions include narcotics, which are preferably given early in the laboring process as they have been known to slow labor if given prior to the woman being 3cm dilated and include butorphanol, morphine, nalbuphine, meperidine and fentanyl. As these decrease pain sensation in the mother and cause the system to relax, the same happens with the fetus with usual signs of respiratory depression.
Another example of pharmacologic pain relief is by using an anesthetic. This can range from topical lidocaine to general anesthesia. With general anesthesia, a natural, vaginal birth is not accomplished as the muscles do not contract to push the fetus into and through the birth canal which then requires a forceps or vacuum delivery or possibly a c-section. For the fetus, CNS depression is often seen with delayed reactions for the first few days of life. What I did not know is there are a few local anesthetics (blocks) that are used such as lidocaine injected into the superficial nerves along the vulva and a pudendal block where an injection is placed into the vagina. Both sound awful as I remember the burning and pain of the local anesthetic I received when needing to be stitched after my tear.
Non-pharmacologic interventions are numerous and not everyone responds to the same method(s). One of the more effective non-pharmacologic interventions is that of touch and massage as this helps to irritate the nerve fibers and block pain signals from reaching the brain. Additionally, having the pressure that massage provides is often very relaxing to a woman and its at this point that deeper and harder mean exactly that! Additionally, music, breathing exercises, aromatherapy, use of a birthing ball, and water are great additives in pain relief and distraction.
Reply Post –
• Discuss three potential barriers that you would anticipate when providing care to Jose based on his age and culture.
• Provide an example of how you would overcome each of the three barriers through the implementation of multidimensional care strategies. Responses
Response5
We are presented with a 55-year-old male patient with scrotal edema, urine retention, and hematuria. The pathological processes that he may be experiencing could be related to the patient possibly suffering from benign prostatic hypertrophy(BPH), which can clog the urethra and cause varicose veins of the local veins, resulting in hematuria and difficulties urinating, as well as being linked to infectious processes that might cause testicular edema (Workman, 2021).
It is a common condition among males as they become older, mainly beyond the age of 40. Because of the enlargement of the prostate gland, the patient has urinary symptoms such as urine retention. This expansion gradually compresses the urethra, eventually producing partial or full obstruction of urine flow out of the bladder. Hematuria is frequent with untreated BPH related to hypervascularity of the prostate, which causes blood vessels to be readily ruptured, and because the prostate is directly involved in the urinary system, any blood leakage caused by this enlargement would be evacuated through the urethra (Workman, 2021).
To effectively deliver multidimensional care, it is necessary to first establish trust and rapport with the patient. Assist in creating an environment in which the patient feels safe and comfortable. Because the patient speaks minimal English, it is necessary to bring in a translator to overcome this language barrier in order to successfully offer quality care and address his overall needs. Also, getting the patient in touch with some resources due to limited finances could be an option as he speaks limited English he may have trouble on his own finding these resources.
Response6
Disease Process + Signs and Symptoms – After reading the case study, I feel Jose’s complaints of edema of the scrotum, urinary retention, and hematuria are related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Jose is 55 years old. Men who are over the age of 50 are at an increased risk for BPH. (Urology Care, 2021) BPH can lead to bladder damage and infection, which can cause blood in the urine. (Urology Care, 2021) Due to the delay in seeking care, I feel an infection has developed, thus explaining blood in Jose’s urine. I also suspect Jose may also have prostate cancer. BPH isn’t cancer, however, prostate cancer can happen at the same time. (Urology Care, 2021) Prostate cancer and BPH have similar symptoms.
• BPH: hesitancy, weak stream, urinary retention, straining to begin urination, postvoid residual, and hematuria when the infection is present. (Urology Care, 2021)
• Prostate Cancer: hematuria (late sign), painful or burning urination, weak stream, hesitancy, and frequency. (John Hopkins Medicine, 2021)
Men who are older than 65 are at an increased risk for prostate cancer, with the average age of diagnosis being 66. (Ignatavicius, 2022) Besides age, having a family history of prostate cancer could put Jose at a greater risk as well. But with what has been presented in the case study, we don’t know exactly Jose’s family history.
Multidementional Care – The first thing I would do is get an interpreter involved since Jose speaks limited english. I would want Jose to understand my education about the disease process (after he was diagnosed of course), and what resources and treatments are available to him. As Jose’s nurse I would not only be an advocate for him, but I would also help him navigate any referrals, tests, and treatments he may have. A social worker is somebody I would also like to get involved to help Jose and his family when it comes to their finacial situation and being able to afford the care Jose may need. If Jose were to be diagnosed with prostate cancer (hopefully not), I would include a psychologist and/or a psychiatrist to help him (and his family) cope with his new diagnosis.

Responses essay paper

Responses

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Response1
The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) clinical judgment measurement model is a tool used to assist nurses in critically thinking and forming solutions. Efficient nurses use this line of thinking while analyzing data, prioritizing hypotheses, generating solutions, and Responses evaluating outcomes. Thinking back to a time when I used the steps in this model, I was actually a certified nursing assistant working with a client in assisted living. In this scenario, a coworker and I had walked in on a client with type two diabetes mellitus who was diaphoretic, shaky, confused, pale, and tachycardic. Knowing that these symptoms were concerning especially with a diagnosis of diabetes, I knew we had to intervene fast and efficiently.
Step one in the clinical judgment model begins with recognizing cues. The importance of the cue collection stage in clinical judgment and reasoning cannot be underestimated. If early subtle cues are missed, this can lead to adverse patient outcomes (Levett-Jones, 2018). The patient cues I observed in this scenario were the client’s diaphoresis, shaking, confusion, pallor, and fast heart rate. To place these observations in order of priority, I used the ABC pneumonic: (A): airway, (B): breathing, and (C): Circulation (Ignatavicius, et al., 2021). When using this method to prioritize cues, I would place them in the order of 1. Tachycardia, 2. Pallor, 3. Diaphoresis, 4. Shaking, and 5. Confusion. Responses
Step 2 in the clinical judgment model is to create and prioritize hypotheses. Based on the analysis of the given cues, I formulated three hypotheses. Since he was a type 2 diabetic, the first hypothesis I generated was that this client experiencing tachycardia, pallor, diaphoresis, shaking, and confusion was hypoglycemic. The second hypothesis I generated was that the client experiencing tachycardia, pallor, diaphoresis, shaking, and confusion was experiencing anxiety. The third hypothesis I generated was that this client experiencing tachycardia, pallor, diaphoresis, shaking, and confusion was developing dementia as he was 80 years old and has a family history of dementia and Parkinson’s disease. Responses
The third step in the clinical judgment model is prioritizing hypotheses. The two priority hypotheses I chose for this patient were hypoglycemia and anxiety. The reason I prioritized the first hypothesis is that the Identification of a hypoglycemic patient is critical due to potential adverse effects including coma and/or death (Matthew, et al., 2022). The reason I chose anxiety over dementia was that anxiety causes high cortisol levels. In moderation, cortisol can be healthy as it triggers the ‘fight or flight’ response from our central nervous system. However, when the body is exposed to high cortisol levels for extended periods of time like in cases such as anxiety, this can lead to fatigue, high blood pressure, headaches, depression, poor sleep, etc. (Premier Health, 2017). Responses
Step 4 of the clinical judgment model is to generate solutions. In this stage, it is important to understand the priority update that needs to be made to the plan of care and priority interventions. The priority intervention for this patient was to notify the registered nurse on call, administer fruit juice or other readily absorbable carbohydrate sources, and call emergency medical services or 911. Severe hypoglycemia can be treated with intravenous (IV) dextrose followed by an infusion of glucose. For conscious patients able to take oral medications, readily absorbable carbohydrate sources (such as fruit juice) should be given (Matthew, et al., 2022). Regular blood sugar checks should be implemented for this patient’s plan of care as well as regular wellnResponsesess checks. Prior to this instance, they were not regularly checked on. Afterward, they had hourly checks by staff.
The last stage of the clinical judgment model is to evaluate outcomes. What went well in this situation is how quickly my coworker and I responded to the scenario. We recognized the client’s symptoms and put them together with the fact that he was diabetic. Knowing that these symptoms aligned with hypoglycemia, we took his blood sugar which was approximately 62 mg/dL. We administered cranberry juice that was in his fridge and called 911. Using the clinical judgment model, we came to the correct conclusion and potentially saved this client’s life. Understanding the steps to this model is crucial when it comes to critical thinking and providing the best outcomes for patients.
Responses
Response2
I will never forget this day. I can remember every detail of this day. It was during the noon hour, there was an overhead page. “Medical Emergency in the parking lot.” Everything after happened so fast, even though it was over a 2.5-hour period. I grabbed a wheelchair on my way out and a father and his son were in front of the door. The father stated, “he has carbon monoxide poising” several times. The son was in the truck saying, “somebody helps me I am going to die” repeatedly, and violented started to vomit. This was happening simultaneously; I was unsure who to address as this was clearly a medical emergency. I had an assumption of drug use in the patient due to his actions. As I was wheeling him into the procedure room of the clinic, several staff members joined me, and I was attempting to give them all the information I had based on the conversation in the parking lot. At this point, everyone understood that it was possible carbon monoxide poising as he was working with machinery in an enclosed space and became nauseous and became confused.
Once we were in the procedure room the patient coded. We immediately began medical emergency interventions our clinic has EKG, and CPR/AED making limited what we could do for the patient. It was chaotic a cop was in and out of the room, and other staff were in and out of the room I asked several times if we should administer Narcan and was told no every time. We brought him back 3 times and he immediately coded again. This continued for about 45 minutes until the ambulance arrived. In the meantime, a helicopter was on its way to meet the ambulance and when the ambulance arrived, they were short-staffed. I climbed into the ambulance with one of the cops and one EMT member and continued to administer CPR. I somehow ended up on the ambulance once it started moving as they were short. Once parked some distance from the clinic I stayed in the ambulance and assisted with CPR while as many of his loved ones as possible, came into and stood outside of the ambulance. They kept asking the patient “why would you do this?” and sobbing and then his father said, “just stop he is not coming back, please.” I didn’t listen or respond, I just kept performing CPR. Finally, the helicopter medicine team came and called it-and we stopped CPR. I apologized to the family and left the ambulance and walked back to the clinic. On my way back I began to cry and told myself to stop. By the time I entered the clinic I composed myself and went to our huddle room out of patient and staff sight. Immediately, my nurse manager asked me if I was in the ambulance the whole time. I said “yes, they were short” to which she responded, I just want to let you know that is against policy to leave the clinic with a patient in the ambulance. What?! This was the worst experience I have ever had, and I was simply trying to save him, and I couldn’t despite desperately attempting due to extenuating circumstances. I broke out in tears and stated I would do it again even though I couldn’t save him.
After the situation, we had a debriefing to see what could have been done differently. We concluded that communication was essential in this situation because there were 2 people in the facility doing CPR for the whole period prior to the ambulance arriving (I was one of them). Then I ended up in the ambulance with some staff not knowing, due to lack of communication.Responses
Once I returned home, I lost it. I kept running the situation over and over in my head wondering what could have been done differently to have had a different outcome. I symptom researched symptoms and treatments. I talked to two close co-workers who were involved in the situation. I couldn’t stop the thoughts or frustration of failing this patient. I understood that if I could have asked the patient questions and focused on him, I could have possibly gotten pertinent information to help him.
I feel now that while there were many instances of ineffective communication, knowing that I can use my voice to bring comfort to others in emergency situations by controlling my actions and emotions the situation in a professional manner and following through. I also learned it was not my fault CPR was not effective however, I feel I should have advocated for the patient to receive the Narcan upon presenting to the clinic. The family refused an autopsy so, we will never know the actual cause of his death. However, Responses I did everything I could to save the patient. I learned that understanding cues, and communication is important in every situation and is essential for optimal outcomes for everyone involved.
The external clues in this scenario include the patient’s presenting symptoms, the communication from those who brought him, and the awareness that this was an emergent situation as evidenced by the preceding factors.
The internal cues in this scenario include the indication of the need for CPR/AED, and EKG Narcan from myself in order to best treat the patient. In addition, my response was to stay with the patient to continue CPR when needed when the ambulance staff was short to ensure that interventions for the patient continued.
The following hypotheses were utilized in this scenario:
The patient’s presenting symptoms are indicative of drug overdose as evidenced by confusion, vomiting, and eventual loss of consciousness. Understanding the reason for the symptoms in the patient will better equip medical staff in ADPIE.
The patient’s symptoms of loss of consciousness, pulselessness, and termination of breathing indicate medical intervention to resuscitate as evidenced by these symptoms. Understanding the priority to stabilize the patient to maintain ABCs to prevent further injury and revive the patient.
Ineffective communication regarding the reason for presenting symptoms, the role of medical staff, and may have changed the outcome for the patient as evidenced by the patient succumbing to his symptoms. Proper communication will result in an optimal outcome for the patient as all aspects of care are covered through proper communication with those involved in the situation.
Action and Evaluation
The ability for any medical staff to deliver Narcan to patients presenting with drug overdose symptoms should be implemented in order to reduce the risk of death to those who do not give information stating they have been using narcotics-especially in the occurrence of loss of consciousness. Evaluation should occur once the medication is administered. Basic life support measures in this scenario should continue throughout the process and remain in place if the patient is unresponsive to Narcan (dhs.org, 2022).
Understanding that CPR/AED measures should continue until the patient is revived or proper medical personnel calls for the death of the patient. Facility policy should reflect this as our duty to patient safety and advocacy should be prioritized in this scenario. Once the policy is adjusted and implemented patient safety and advocacy will prevail in more situations. If the policy cannot change staff should utilize nursing judgment and not be penalized in extreme situations for non-adherence to the policy (AHA, 2000).
Response3
Pharmacological – Some pharmacological treatment include administering epidural analgesia or administering nitrous oxide gas for pain relief. Epidurals are considered the most effective and recommended method of pain relief (Czech et al, 2018). Th\is method of pain relief had the lowest rate of pain during each stages of labour (Czech et al, 2018). There were some studies that showed an epidural has a greater risk for performing instrumental vaginal delivery (Czech et al, 2018). Some side effects include back pain, headaches, (Czech et al, 2018). There is always a chance at developing a fever due to the epidural and while being pregnant and having a fever that can increase the baby being born with poor muscle tone, breathing issues, and lower Apgar scores (Birth injury, 2022). Another method of pain delivery includes nitrous oxide gas. This method has relieved pain with no adverse foetal outcomes (Czech et al, 2018). This is also the second most common used pain relief behind the epidural, but most women have been satisfied with their experience with it (Czech et al, 2018). There was records that stated this was the worst reduction of pain during the second and third stages of labour, compared to the epidural (Czech et al, 2018). When combined with TENS or water immersion the results were better (Czech et al, 2018).
Non-pharmacological – Some non-pharmacological pain relief includes TENS and water birth or immersion. Water birth has been around for a long time, but just recently has been becoming more popular (Czech et al, 2018). During this process, the hydrostatic pressure is lower than the intraabdominal pressure, which eases the breathing and changing of positions (Czech et al, 2018). During contractions, the pelvic tissues are more elastic and flexible, which reduces the amount of pain (Czech et al, 2018). Another form of pain relief is transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or other words TENS. This is considered the most least satisfying methods, but when combined with gas control, the effects increased (Czech et al, 2018). during the first stages of labour, TENS was successful, but later stages it was minimizing or postponing the pharmacological analgesia (Czech et al, 2018).
Response4
Pharmacological interventions include narcotics, which are preferably given early in the laboring process as they have been known to slow labor if given prior to the woman being 3cm dilated and include butorphanol, morphine, nalbuphine, meperidine and fentanyl. As these decrease pain sensation in the mother and cause the system to relax, the same happens with the fetus with usual signs of respiratory depression.
Another example of pharmacologic pain relief is by using an anesthetic. This can range from topical lidocaine to general anesthesia. With general anesthesia, a natural, vaginal birth is not accomplished as the muscles do not contract to push the fetus into and through the birth canal which then requires a forceps or vacuum delivery or possibly a c-section. For the fetus, CNS depression is often seen with delayed reactions for the first few days of life. What I did not know is there are a few local anesthetics (blocks) that are used such as lidocaine injected into the superficial nerves along the vulva and a pudendal block where an injection is placed into the vagina. Both sound awful as I remember the burning and pain of the local anesthetic I received when needing to be stitched after my tear.
Non-pharmacologic interventions are numerous and not everyone responds to the same method(s). One of the more effective non-pharmacologic interventions is that of touch and massage as this helps to irritate the nerve fibers and block pain signals from reaching the brain. Additionally, having the pressure that massage provides is often very relaxing to a woman and its at this point that deeper and harder mean exactly that! Additionally, music, breathing exercises, aromatherapy, use of a birthing ball, and water are great additives in pain relief and distraction.
Reply Post –
• Discuss three potential barriers that you would anticipate when providing care to Jose based on his age and culture. Responses
• Provide an example of how you would overcome each of the three barriers through the implementation of multidimensional care strategies.
Response5
We are presented with a 55-year-old male patient with scrotal edema, urine retention, and hematuria. The pathological processes that he may be experiencing could be related to the patient possibly suffering from benign prostatic hypertrophy(BPH), which can clog the urethra and cause varicose veins of the local veins, resulting in hematuria and difficulties urinating, as well as being linked to infectious processes that might cause testicular edema (Workman, 2021).
It is a common condition among males as they become older, mainly beyond the age of 40. Because of the enlargement of the prostate gland, the patient has urinary symptoms such as urine retention. This expansion Responses gradually compresses the urethra, eventually producing partial or full obstruction of urine flow out of the bladder. Hematuria is frequent with untreated BPH related to hypervascularity of the prostate, which causes blood vessels to be readily ruptured, and because the prostate is directly involved in the urinary system, any blood leakage caused by this enlargement would be evacuated through the urethra (Workman, 2021).
To effectively deliver multidimensional care, it is necessary to first establish trust and rapport with the patient. Assist in creating an environment in which the patient feels safe and comfortable. Because the patient speaks minimal English, it is necessary to bring in a translator to overcome this language barrier in order to successfully offer quality care and address his overall needs. Also, getting the patient in touch with some resources due to limited finances could be an option as he speaks limited English he may have trouble on his own finding these resources.
Response6
Disease Process + Signs and Symptoms – After reading the case study, I feel Jose’s complaints of edema of the scrotum, urinary retention, and hematuria are related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Jose is 55 years old. Men who are over the age of 50 are at an increased risk for BPH. (Urology Care, 2021) BPH can lead to bladder damage and infection, which can cause blood in the urine. (Urology Care, 2021) Due to the delay in seeking care, I feel an infection has developed, thus explaining blood in Jose’s urine. I also suspect Jose may also have prostate cancer. BPH isn’t cancer, however, prostate cancer can happen at the same time. (Urology Care, 2021) Prostate cancer and BPH have similar symptoms.
• BPH: hesitancy, weak stream, urinary retention, straining to begin urination, postvoid residual, and hematuria when the infection is present. (Urology Care, 2021)
• Prostate Cancer: hematuria (late sign), painful or burning urination, weak stream, hesitancy, and frequency. (John Hopkins Medicine, 2021)
Men who are older than 65 are at an increased risk for prostate cancer, with the average age of diagnosis being 66. (Ignatavicius, 2022) Besides age, having a family history of prostate cancer could put Jose at a greater risk as well. But with what has been presented in the case study, we don’t know exactly Jose’s family history.
Multidementional Care – The first thing I would do is get an interpreter involved since Jose speaks limited english. I would want Jose to understand my education about the disease process (after he was diagnosed of course), and what resources and treatments are available to him. As Jose’s nurse I would not only be an advocate for him, but I would also help him navigate any referrals, tests, and treatments he may have. A social worker is somebody I would also like to get involved to help Jose and his family when it comes to their finacial situation and being able to afford the care Jose may need. If Jose were to be diagnosed with prostate cancer (hopefully not), I would include a psychologist and/or a psychiatrist to help him (and his family) cope with his new diagnosis.

Responses essay paper

Responses

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

6053

 

AB-peer 1

The healthcare issue that I chose to discuss is nurse practitioner-physician co-management. Today in healthcare

physicians are an asset to any facility. There is a need for more coverage in healthcare where physicians may be in short supply.

Nurse practitioners are becoming a major part of healthcare practice whether it be in an inpatient setting, a clinic, or private

practice. Having nurse practitioners available has been able to help meet the increasing demands that are in primary care

(Norful, et.al., 2018). To have a physician and a nurse practitioner work together to provide primary care for patients is a type of

co-management that is needed in healthcare. Through this type of co-management, there is effective communication; mutual

respect and trust; and clinical alignment/shared philosophy of care (Norful, et.al., 2018). These are reasons that physicians and

nurse practitioners should work together in providing the best care for patients. This would help lighten the workload for both

practitioners as well as improve patient care (Norful, et.al., 2018). For this change to take place in healthcare, the complexity ofResponses

the problems that may be faced as well as the solutions that are to be implemented must be discussed (Broome & Marshall,

2021). In my current place of work, we have physicians and nurse practitioners. They cover for each other as far as seeing

patients if one of them is sick, on vacation, or has a busy schedule. They work together well and provide excellent care for our

patients. This system of co-management works at our rural hospital and helps practitioners provide quality patient care and

ensure that patients are seen in a timely manner. The practitioners even make sure that they have time slotted in their schedulesResponses

to provide care through a sick clinic so that patients can be seen on short notice. There is a growing number of nurse

practitioners who can provide care that overlaps with the care that is provided by physicians (Auerbach, et.al., 2018). This is a

sure way that patients are given the care that is quality and that practitioners know what the patients need, and they provide that for

them. We as healthcare providers are fortunate to have such amazing opportunities to provide the best care possible for our

patients and to ensure they are cared for.

 

Responses

 

Peer 2- JA

Nurse practitioner and physician co-management is an excellent solution to the healthcare issue of decreases in primary care selections. Reducing the workload and stress placed on one physician benefits patients because they reap better health outcomes (Norful et al., 2018). Co-management also allows for the spread of paperwork and follow-ups (Norful et al., 2018). Improving compliance with follow-ups would be an outstanding achievement in ensuring patients follow recommendations to stay as healthy as possible.

In my hospital, nurse practitioners work alongside physicians in the adult world; however, none on the pediatric floor. There is an unfortunate shortage of pediatric nurse practitioners in the United States. Gigli and others (2019) report that only 5% of nurse practitioners in the U.S. are specialized in pediatrics. As more pediatric nurse practitioners graduate, hopefully, more opportunities for co-management will become available to the pediatric population. This stressor impacts my work area by relying on the pediatricians to complete all the work. Hiring a pediatric NP would help decrease their stress in the day-to-day job and allow more time to be spent with each child or newborn.

Responses

 

 

 

 

 

 

6052

 

Peer 1 JA

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is critical to delivering safe, quality care and is incorporated into the quadruple aim (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Additionally, evidence-based practice allows healthcare providers to ensure they deliver the best research-backed care. As upcoming nurse practitioners, students should be sure to join organizations that support the use of EBP.

American Association of Nurse Practitioners

The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) is an organization and resource to utilize as healthcare professionals. The AANP’s mission encourages nurse practitioners and NP students to enhance their knowledge of providing high-quality, evidence-based care (AANP, n.d.-a). By joining this healthcare organization, one benefits from participating in continuing education and professional development opportunities (AANP, n.d.-a). EBP also appears throughout the AANP’s core values because they value promoting best practices and patient outcomes (AANP, n.d.-b). Responses

Given that principles of EBP are at the root of the AANPs mission statement and core values, I would say this organization’s work is grounded in EPB. Melnyk (2018), a member of the AANP), explains how using EBP has even been shown to reduce burnout, as it inspires practitioners to deliver care that improves patient outcomes. Melnyk (2018) encourages the use of EBP to members and includes a list of EBP resources directly from the AANP.

Given the information on the American Association of Nurse Practitioners website, my perception of this organization has not changed. I already felt this organization was very reputable. However, I do have more respect for the organization, knowing they support evidence-based practice at their core. As a nurse practitioner student, this organization would be appropriate to join to advocate for future patients.

 

Responses

 

Peer 2 AF

The Joint Commission (TJC) has been around since 1951 and is a well-known accrediting body (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). The Joint Commission compiles a set of standards derived from evidenced-based practice on patient safety, medication administration, medical errors, and many more (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). The standards are revised consistently due to developments in technology and medicine which keeps relevant information up to date to provide high quality care to patients. The Joint Commission performs on-site surveys in  hospitals and many other healthcare settings to inspect the health practices, education, and patient safety measures implemented (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). This ensures that hospitals are following evidenced based practices (EBP) that create positive health outcomes for their patients. In addition, TJC assists with distributing valuable information and provides resources concerning the quality of care and safety of patients (Why Choose The Joint Commission, 2022). According to TJC, patient safety concerns are reviewed and evidenced-based practices are created as a remedy to the problem (Patient Safety, 2022). The Joint Commission consists of: The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare, Joint Commission Resources, and Joint Commission International (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). Joint Commission Resources provides access to journals and educational resources (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). This allows EBP to be easily accessible to the public. Evidenced-based practice is stated in many areas of the TJC’s website such as in the standards of care, patient safety, and FAQs on The Joint Commission. This healthcare organization is rooted in evidenced-based practices because the standards of care originate from the solutions and studies of EBP.

My perception has changed from the information found on the healthcare organization’s website. It has actually given me a clearer understanding on the need to be accredited and the standards that must be followed to provide quality care and the best outcomes for patients. The Joint Commission typically follows the care of a patient from the unit the patient is in and the interactions with healthcare professionals. They survey the current practices instituted in hospitals and the knowledge healthcare workers have to determine if they adhere to the standards of practice. Responses

Responses essay paper

Responses

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

 

 

6053

 

AB-peer 1

The healthcare issue that I chose to discuss is nurse practitioner-physician co-management. Today in healthcare

physicians are an asset to any facility. There is a need for more coverage in healthcare where physicians may be in short supply.

Nurse practitioners are becoming a major part of healthcare practice whether it be in an inpatient setting, a clinic, or private

practice. Having nurse practitioners available has been able to help meet the increasing demands that are in primary care

(Norful, et.al., 2018). To have a physician and a nurse practitioner work together to provide primary care for patients is a type of

co-management that is needed in healthcare. Through this type of co-management, there is effective communication; mutualResponses

respect and trust; and clinical alignment/shared philosophy of care (Norful, et.al., 2018). These are reasons that physicians and

nurse practitioners should work together in providing the best care for patients. This would help lighten the workload for both

practitioners as well as improve patient care (Norful, et.al., 2018). For this change to take place in healthcare, the complexity of

the problems that may be faced as well as the solutions that are to be implemented must be discussed (Broome & Marshall,

2021). In my current place of work, we have physicians and nurse practitioners. They cover for each other as far as seeing

patients if one of them is sick, on vacation, or has a busy schedule. They work together well and provide excellent care for ourResponses

patients. This system of co-management works at our rural hospital and helps practitioners provide quality patient care and

ensure that patients are seen in a timely manner. The practitioners even make sure that they have time slotted in their schedules

to provide care through a sick clinic so that patients can be seen on short notice. There is a growing number of nurse

practitioners who can provide care that overlaps with the care that is provided by physicians (Auerbach, et.al., 2018). This is a

sure way that patients are given the care that is quality and that practitioners know what the patients need, and they provide that for

them. We as healthcare providers are fortunate to have such amazing opportunities to provide the best care possible for our

patients and to ensure they are cared for.

Responses

 

 

Peer 2- JA

Nurse practitioner and physician co-management is an excellent solution to the healthcare issue of decreases in primary care selections. Reducing the workload and stress placed on one physician benefits patients because they reap better health outcomes (Norful et al., 2018). Co-management also allows for the spread of paperwork and follow-ups (Norful et al., 2018). Improving compliance with follow-ups would be an outstanding achievement in ensuring patients follow recommendations to stay as healthy as possible. Responses

In my hospital, nurse practitioners work alongside physicians in the adult world; however, none on the pediatric floor. There is an unfortunate shortage of pediatric nurse practitioners in the United States. Gigli and others (2019) report that only 5% of nurse practitioners in the U.S. are specialized in pediatrics. As more pediatric nurse practitioners graduate, hopefully, more opportunities for co-management will become available to the pediatric population. This stressor impacts my work area by relying on the pediatricians to complete all the work. Hiring a pediatric NP would help decrease their stress in the day-to-day job and allow more time to be spent with each child or newborn.Responses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6052

 

Peer 1 JA

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is critical to delivering safe, quality care and is incorporated into the quadruple aim (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Additionally, evidence-based practice allows healthcare providers to ensure they deliver the best research-backed care. As upcoming nurse practitioners, students should be sure to join organizations that support the use of EBP. Responses

American Association of Nurse Practitioners

The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) is an organization and resource to utilize as healthcare professionals. The AANP’s mission encourages nurse practitioners and NP students to enhance their knowledge of providing high-quality, evidence-based care (AANP, n.d.-a). By joining this healthcare organization, one benefits from participating in continuing education and professional development opportunities (AANP, n.d.-a). EBP also appears throughout the AANP’s core values because they value promoting best practices and patient outcomes (AANP, n.d.-b). Responses

Given that principles of EBP are at the root of the AANPs mission statement and core values, I would say this organization’s work is grounded in EPB. Melnyk (2018), a member of the AANP), explains how using EBP has even been shown to reduce burnout, as it inspires practitioners to deliver care that improves patient outcomes. Melnyk (2018) encourages the use of EBP to members and includes a list of EBP resources directly from the AANP.

Given the information on the American Association of Nurse Practitioners website, my perception of this organization has not changed. I already felt this organization was very reputable. However, I do have more respect for the organization, knowing they support evidence-based practice at their core. As a nurse practitioner student, this organization would be appropriate to join to advocate for future patients.

Responses

 

 

Peer 2 AF

The Joint Commission (TJC) has been around since 1951 and is a well-known accrediting body (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). The Joint Commission compiles a set of standards derived from evidenced-based practice on patient safety, medication administration, medical errors, and many more (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). The standards are revised consistently due to developments in technology and medicine which keeps relevant information up to date to provide high quality care to patients. The Joint Commission performs on-site surveys in  hospitals and many other healthcare settings to inspect the health practices, education, and patient safety measures implemented (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). This ensures that hospitals are following evidenced based practices (EBP) that create positive health outcomes for their patients. In addition, TJC assists with distributing valuable information and provides resources concerning the quality of care and safety of patients (Why Choose The Joint Commission, 2022). According to TJC, patient safety concerns are reviewed and evidenced-based practices are created as a remedy to the problem (Patient Safety, 2022). The Joint Commission consists of: The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare, Joint Commission Resources, and Joint Commission International (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). Joint Commission Resources provides access to journals and educational resources (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). This allows EBP to be easily accessible to the public. Evidenced-based practice is stated in many areas of the TJC’s website such as in the standards of care, patient safety, and FAQs on The Joint Commission. This healthcare organization is rooted in evidenced-based practices because the standards of care originate from the solutions and studies of EBP.Responses

My perception has changed from the information found on the healthcare organization’s website. It has actually given me a clearer understanding on the need to be accredited and the standards that must be followed to provide quality care and the best outcomes for patients. The Joint Commission typically follows the care of a patient from the unit the patient is in and the interactions with healthcare professionals. They survey the current practices instituted in hospitals and the knowledge healthcare workers have to determine if they adhere to the standards of practice.

Responses

 

 

 

Responses Essay paper

Responses

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW6053

 

AB-peer 1

The healthcare issue that I chose to discuss is nurse practitioner-physician co-management. Today in healthcare

physicians are an asset to any facility. There is a need for more coverage in healthcare where physicians may be in short supply.Responses

Nurse practitioners are becoming a major part of healthcare practice whether it be in an inpatient setting, a clinic, or private

practice. Having nurse practitioners available has been able to help meet the increasing demands that are in primary care

(Norful, et.al., 2018). To have a physician and a nurse practitioner work together to provide primary care for patients is a type of

co-management that is needed in healthcare. Through this type of co-management, there is effective communication; mutualResponses

respect and trust; and clinical alignment/shared philosophy of care (Norful, et.al., 2018). These are reasons that physicians and

nurse practitioners should work together in providing the best care for patients. This would help lighten the workload for both

practitioners as well as improve patient care (Norful, et.al., 2018). For this change to take place in healthcare, the complexity of

the problems that may be faced as well as the solutions that Responses are to be implemented must be discussed (Broome & Marshall,

2021). In my current place of work, we have physicians and nurse practitioners. They cover for each other as far as seeing

patients if one of them is sick, on vacation, or has a busy schedule. They work together well and provide excellent care for our

patients. This system of co-management works at our rural hospital and helps practitioners provide quality patient care and

ensure that patients are seen in a timely manner. The practitioners even make sure that they have time slotted in their schedules

to provide care through a sick clinic so that patients can be seen on short notice. There is a growing number of nurse

practitioners who can provide care that overlaps with the care that is provided by physicians (Auerbach, et.al., 2018). This is a

sure way that patients are given the care that is quality and that practitioners know what the patients need, and they provide that for

them. We as healthcare providers are fortunate to have suchResponses amazing opportunities to provide the best care possible for our

patients and to ensure they are cared for. 

 

 

 

Peer 2- JA

Nurse practitioner and physician co-management is an excellent solution to the healthcare issue of decreases in primary care selections. Reducing the workload and stress placed on one physician benefits patients because they reap better health outcomes (Norful et al., 2018). Co-management also allows for the spread of paperwork and follow-ups (Norful et al., 2018). Improving compliance with follow-ups would be an outstanding achievement in ensuring patients follow recommendations to stay as healthy as possible. 

            In my hospital, nurse practitioners work alongside physicians in the adult world; however, none on the pediatric floor. There is an unfortunate shortage of pediatric nurse practitioners in the United States. Gigli and others (2019) report that only 5% of nurse practitioners in the U.S. are specialized in pediatrics. Responses As more pediatric nurse practitioners graduate, hopefully, more opportunities for co-management will become available to the pediatric population. This stressor impacts my work area by relying on the pediatricians to complete all the work. Hiring a pediatric NP would help decrease their stress in the day-to-day job and allow more time to be spent with each child or newborn.

6052

Peer 1 JA

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is critical to delivering safe, quality care and is incorporated into the quadruple aim (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Additionally, evidence-based practice allows healthcare providers to ensure they deliver the best research-backed care. As upcoming nurse practitioners, students should be sure to join organizations that support the use of EBP. 

American Association of Nurse Practitioners

            The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) is an organization and resource to utilize as Responses healthcare professionals. The AANP’s mission encourages nurse practitioners and NP students to enhance their knowledge of providing high-quality, evidence-based care (AANP, n.d.-a). By joining this healthcare organization, one benefits from participating in continuing education and professional development opportunities (AANP, n.d.-a). EBP also appears throughout the AANP’s core values because they value promoting best practices and patient outcomes (AANP, n.d.-b). 

            Given that principles of EBP are at the root of the AANPs mission statement and core values, I would say this organization’s work is grounded in EPB. Melnyk (2018), a member of the AANP), explains how using EBP has even been shown to reduce burnout, as it inspires practitioners to deliver care that improves patient outcomes. Melnyk (2018) encourages the use of EBP to members and includes a list of EBP resources directly from the AANP. 

            Given the information on the American Association of Nurse Practitioners website, my perception of this organization has not changed. I already felt this organization was very reputable. However, I do have more respect for the organization, knowing they support evidence-based practice at their core. As a nurse practitioner student, this organization would be appropriate to join to advocate for future patients.

Peer 2 AF

The Joint Commission (TJC) has been around since 1951 and is a well-known accrediting body (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). The Joint Commission compiles a set of standards derived from evidenced-based practice on patient safety, medication administration, medical errors, and many more (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). The standards are revised consistently due to developments in technology and medicine which keeps relevant information up to date to provide high quality care to patients. The Joint Commission performs on-site surveys in  hospitals and many other healthcare settings to inspect the health practices, education, and patient safety measures implemented (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). This ensures that hospitals are following evidenced based practices (EBP) that create positive health outcomes for Responses their patients. In addition, TJC assists with distributing valuable information and provides resources concerning the quality of care and safety of patients (Why Choose The Joint Commission, 2022). According to TJC, patient safety concerns are reviewedand evidenced-based practices are created as a remedy to the problem (Patient Safety, 2022). The Joint Commission consists of: The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare, Joint Commission Resources, and Joint Commission International (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). Joint Commission Resources provides access to journals and educational resources (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). This allows EBP to be easily accessible to the public. Evidenced-based practice is stated in many areas of the TJC’s website such as in the standards of care, patient safety, and FAQs on The Joint Commission. This healthcare organization is rooted in evidenced-based practices because the standards of care originate from the solutions and studies of EBP.

         My perception has changed from the information found on the healthcare organization’s website. It has actually given me a clearer understanding on the need to be accredited and the standards that must be followed to provide quality care and the best outcomes for patients. The Joint Commission typically follows the care of a patient from the unit the patient is in and the interactions with healthcare professionals. They survey the current practices instituted in hospitals and the knowledge healthcare workers have to determine if they adhere to the standards of practice. 

Responses essay paper

Responses

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

 

 

6053

 

AB-peer 1

The healthcare issue that I chose to discuss is nurse practitioner-physician co-management. Today in healthcare

physicians are an asset to any facility. There is a need for more coverage in healthcare where physicians may be in short supply.

Nurse practitioners are becoming a major part of healthcare practice whether it be in an inpatient setting, a clinic, or private

practice. Having nurse practitioners available has been able to help meet the increasing demands that are in primary care

(Norful, et.al., 2018). To have a physician and a nurse practitioner work together to provide primary care for patients is a type of

co-management that is needed in healthcare. Through this type of co-management, there is effective communication; mutual

respect and trust; and clinical alignment/shared philosophy of care (Norful, et.al., 2018). These are reasons that physicians and

nurse practitioners should work together in providing the best care for patients. This would help lighten the workload for bothResponses

practitioners as well as improve patient care (Norful, et.al., 2018). For this change to take place in healthcare, the complexity of

the problems that may be faced as well as the solutions that are to be implemented must be discussed (Broome & Marshall,

2021). In my current place of work, we have physicians and nurse practitioners. They cover for each other as far as seeing

patients if one of them is sick, on vacation, or has a busy schedule. They work together well and provide excellent care for our

patients. This system of co-management works at our rural hospital and helps practitioners provide quality patient care and

ensure that patients are seen in a timely manner. The practitioners even make sure that they have time slotted in their schedules

to provide care through a sick clinic so that patients can be seen on short notice. There is a growing number of nurse

practitioners who can provide care that overlaps with the care that is provided by physicians (Auerbach, et.al., 2018). This is a

sure way that patients are given the care that is quality and that practitioners know what the patients need, and they provide that for

them. We as healthcare providers are fortunate to have such amazing opportunities to provide the best care possible for our

patients and to ensure they are cared for. Responses

 

 

 

Peer 2- JA

Nurse practitioner and physician co-management is an excellent solution to the healthcare issue of decreases in primary care selections. Reducing the workload and stress placed on one physician benefits patients because they reap better health outcomes (Norful et al., 2018). Co-management also allows for the spread of paperwork and follow-ups (Norful et al., 2018). Improving compliance with follow-ups would be an outstanding achievement in ensuring patients follow recommendations to stay as healthy as possible.

In my hospital, nurse practitioners work alongside physicians in the adult world; however, none on the pediatric floor. There is an unfortunate shortage of pediatric nurse practitioners in the United States. Gigli and others (2019) report that only 5% of nurse practitioners in the U.S. are specialized in pediatrics. As more pediatric nurse practitioners graduate, hopefully, more opportunities for co-management will become available to the pediatric population. This stressor impacts my work area by relying on the pediatricians to complete all the work. Hiring a pediatric NP would help decrease their stress in the day-to-day job and allow more time to be spent with each child or newborn.Responses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6052

 

Peer 1 JA

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is critical to delivering safe, quality care and is incorporated into the quadruple aim (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Additionally, evidence-based practice allows healthcare providers to ensure they deliver the best research-backed care. As upcoming nurse practitioners, students should be sure to join organizations that support the use of EBP.

American Association of Nurse Practitioners

The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) is an organization and resource to utilize as healthcare professionals. The AANP’s mission encourages nurse practitioners and NP students to enhance their knowledge of providing high-quality, evidence-based care (AANP, n.d.-a). By joining this healthcare organization, one benefits from participating in continuing education and professional development opportunities (AANP, n.d.-a). EBP also appears throughout the AANP’s core values because they value promoting best practices and patient outcomes (AANP, n.d.-b). Responses

Given that principles of EBP are at the root of the AANPs mission statement and core values, I would say this organization’s work is grounded in EPB. Melnyk (2018), a member of the AANP), explains how using EBP has even been shown to reduce burnout, as it inspires practitioners to deliver care that improves patient outcomes. Melnyk (2018) encourages the use of EBP to members and includes a list of EBP resources directly from the AANP. Responses

Given the information on the American Association of Nurse Practitioners website, my perception of this organization has not changed. I already felt this organization was very reputable. However, I do have more respect for the organization, knowing they support evidence-based practice at their core. As a nurse practitioner student, this organization would be appropriate to join to advocate for future patients.Responses

 

 

 

Peer 2 AF

The Joint Commission (TJC) has been around since 1951 and is a well-known accrediting body (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). The Joint Commission compiles a set of standards derived from evidenced-based practice on patient safety, medication administration, medical errors, and many more (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). The standards are revised consistently due to developments in technology and medicine which keeps relevant information up to date to provide high quality care to patients. The Joint Commission performs on-site surveys in  hospitals and many other healthcare settings to inspect the health practices, education, and patient safety measures implemented (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). This ensures that hospitals are following evidenced based practices (EBP) that create positive health outcomes for their patients. In addition, TJC assists with distributing valuable information and provides resources concerning the quality of care and safety of patients (Why Choose The Joint Commission, 2022). According to TJC, patient safety concerns are reviewed and evidenced-based practices are created as a remedy to the problem (Patient Safety, 2022). The Joint Commission consists of: The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare, Joint Commission Resources, and Joint Commission International (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). Joint Commission Resources provides access to journals and educational resources (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). This allows EBP to be easily accessible to the public. Evidenced-based practice is stated in many areas of the TJC’s website such as in the standards of care, patient safety, and FAQs on The Joint Commission. This healthcare organization is rooted in evidenced-based practices because the standards of care originate from the solutions and studies of EBP.Responses

My perception has changed from the information found on the healthcare organization’s website. It has actually given me a clearer understanding on the need to be accredited and the standards that must be followed to provide quality care and the best outcomes for patients. The Joint Commission typically follows the care of a patient from the unit the patient is in and the interactions with healthcare professionals. They survey the current practices instituted in hospitals and the knowledge healthcare workers have to determine if they adhere to the standards of practice. Responses

 

 

 

 

Responses essay paper

Responses

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

 

 

6053

 

AB-peer 1

The healthcare issue that I chose to discuss is nurse practitioner-physician co-management. Today in healthcare

physicians are an asset to any facility. There is a need for more coverage in healthcare where physicians may be in short supply.

Nurse practitioners are becoming a major part of healthcare practice whether it be in an inpatient setting, a clinic, or private

practice. Having nurse practitioners available has been able to help meet the increasing demands that are in primary care

(Norful, et.al., 2018). To have a physician and a nurse practitioner work together to provide primary care for patients is a type of

co-management that is needed in healthcare. Through this type of co-management, there is effective communication; mutual

respect and trust; and clinical alignment/shared philosophy of care (Norful, et.al., 2018). These are reasons that physicians and

nurse practitioners should work together in providing the best care for patients. This would help lighten the workload for both

practitioners as well as improve patient care (Norful, et.al., 2018). For this change to take place in healthcare, the complexity of

the problems that may be faced as well as the solutions that are to be implemented must be discussed (Broome & Marshall,

2021). In my current place of work, we have physicians and nurse practitioners. They cover for each other as far as seeing

patients if one of them is sick, on vacation, or has a busy schedule. They work together well and provide excellent care for our

patients. This system of co-management works at our rural hospital and helps practitioners provide quality patient care and

ensure that patients are seen in a timely manner. The practitioners even make sure that they have time slotted in their schedules

to provide care through a sick clinic so that patients can be seen on short notice. There is a growing number of nurse

practitioners who can provide care that overlaps with the care that is provided by physicians (Auerbach, et.al., 2018). This is a

sure way that patients are given the care that is quality and that practitioners know what the patients need, and they provide that for

them. We as healthcare providers are fortunate to have such amazing opportunities to provide the best care possible for our

patients and to ensure they are cared for. Responses

 

 

 

Peer 2- JA

Nurse practitioner and physician co-management is an excellent solution to the healthcare issue of decreases in primary care selections. Reducing the workload and stress placed on one physician benefits patients because they reap better health outcomes (Norful et al., 2018). Co-management also allows for the spread of paperwork and follow-ups (Norful et al., 2018). Improving compliance with follow-ups would be an outstanding achievement in ensuring patients follow recommendations to stay as healthy as possible. Responses

In my hospital, nurse practitioners work alongside physicians in the adult world; however, none on the pediatric floor. There is an unfortunate shortage of pediatric nurse practitioners in the United States. Gigli and others (2019) report that only 5% of nurse practitioners in the U.S. are specialized in pediatrics. As more pediatric nurse practitioners graduate, hopefully, more opportunities for co-management will become available to the pediatric population. This stressor impacts my work area by relying on the pediatricians to complete all the work. Hiring a pediatric NP would help decrease their stress in the day-to-day job and allow more time to be spent with each child or newborn.Responses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6052

 

Peer 1 JA

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is critical to delivering safe, quality care and is incorporated into the quadruple aim (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Additionally, evidence-based practice allows healthcare providers to ensure they deliver the best research-backed care. As upcoming nurse practitioners, students should be sure to join organizations that support the use of EBP. Responses

American Association of Nurse Practitioners

The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) is an organization and resource to utilize as healthcare professionals. The AANP’s mission encourages nurse practitioners and NP students to enhance their knowledge of providing high-quality, evidence-based care (AANP, n.d.-a). By joining this healthcare organization, one benefits from participating in continuing education and professional development opportunities (AANP, n.d.-a). EBP also appears throughout the AANP’s core values because they value promoting best practices and patient outcomes (AANP, n.d.-b). Responses

Given that principles of EBP are at the root of the AANPs mission statement and core values, I would say this organization’s work is grounded in EPB. Melnyk (2018), a member of the AANP), explains how using EBP has even been shown to reduce burnout, as it inspires practitioners to deliver care that improves patient outcomes. Melnyk (2018) encourages the use of EBP to members and includes a list of EBP resources directly from the AANP.

Given the information on the American Association of Nurse Practitioners website, my perception of this organization has not changed. I already felt this organization was very reputable. However, I do have more respect for the organization, knowing they support evidence-based practice at their core. As a nurse practitioner student, this organization would be appropriate to join to advocate for future patients.Responses

 

 

 

Peer 2 AF

The Joint Commission (TJC) has been around since 1951 and is a well-known accrediting body (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). The Joint Commission compiles a set of standards derived from evidenced-based practice on patient safety, medication administration, medical errors, and many more (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). The standards are revised consistently due to developments in technology and medicine which keeps relevant information up to date to provide high quality care to patients. The Joint Commission performs on-site surveys in  hospitals and many other healthcare settings to inspect the health practices, education, and patient safety measures implemented (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). This ensures that hospitals are following evidenced based practices (EBP) that create positive health outcomes for their patients. In addition, TJC assists with distributing valuable information and provides resources concerning the quality of care and safety of patients (Why Choose The Joint Commission, 2022). According to TJC, patient safety concerns are reviewed and evidenced-based practices are created as a remedy to the problem (Patient Safety, 2022). The Joint Commission consists of: The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare, Joint Commission Resources, and Joint Commission International (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). Joint Commission Resources provides access to journals and educational resources (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). This allows EBP to be easily accessible to the public. Evidenced-based practice is stated in many areas of the TJC’s website such as in the standards of care, patient safety, and FAQs on The Joint Commission. This healthcare organization is rooted in evidenced-based practices because the standards of care originate from the solutions and studies of EBP.Responses

My perception has changed from the information found on the healthcare organization’s website. It has actually given me a clearer understanding on the need to be accredited and the standards that must be followed to provide quality care and the best outcomes for patients. The Joint Commission typically follows the care of a patient from the unit the patient is in and the interactions with healthcare professionals. They survey the current practices instituted in hospitals and the knowledge healthcare workers have to determine if they adhere to the standards of practice.

Responses

 

 

 

Responses essay paper

Responses

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW6053

 

AB-peer 1

The healthcare issue that I chose to discuss is nurse practitioner-Responses physician co-management. Today in healthcare

physicians are an asset to any facility. There is a need for more coverage in healthcare where physicians may be in short supply.

Nurse practitioners are becoming a major part of healthcare practice whether it be in an inpatient setting, a clinic, or private

practice. Having nurse practitioners available has been able to Responses help meet the increasing demands that are in primary care

(Norful, et.al., 2018). To have a physician and a nurse practitioner work together to provide primary care for patients is a type of

co-management that is needed in healthcare. Through this type of co-management, there is effective communication; mutual

respect and trust; and clinical alignment/shared philosophy of care (Norful, et.al., 2018). These are reasons Responses that physicians and

nurse practitioners should work together in providing the best care for patients. This would help lighten the workload for both

practitioners as well as improve patient care (Norful, et.al., 2018). For this change to take place in healthcare, the complexity of

the problems that may be faced as well as the solutions that are to be implemented must be discussed (Broome & Marshall,

2021). In my current place of work, we have physicians and nurse practitioners. They cover for each other Responses as far as seeing

patients if one of them is sick, on vacation, or has a busy schedule. They work together well and provide excellent care for our

patients. This system of co-management works at our rural hospital and helps practitioners provide quality patient care and

ensure that patients are seen in a timely manner. The practitioners even make sure that they have time slotted in their schedules

to provide care through a sick clinic so that patients can be seen on short notice. There is a growing number of nurse

practitioners who can provide care that overlaps with the care that Responses is provided by physicians (Auerbach, et.al., 2018). This is a

sure way that patients are given the care that is quality and that practitioners know what the patients need, and they provide that for

them. We as healthcare providers are fortunate to have such amazing opportunities to provide the best care possible for our

patients and to ensure they are cared for. 

 

 

 

Peer 2- JA

Nurse practitioner and physician co-management is an excellentResponses  solution to the healthcare issue of decreases in primary care selections. Reducing the workload and stress placed on one physician benefits patients because they reap better health outcomes (Norful et al., 2018). Co-management also allows for the spread of paperwork and follow-ups (Norful et al., 2018). Improving compliance with follow-ups would be an outstanding achievement in ensuring patients follow recommendations to stay as healthy as possible. 

            In my hospital, nurse practitioners work alongside physicians in the adult world; however, none on the pediatric floor. There is an unfortunate shortage of pediatric nurse practitioners in the United States. Gigli and others (2019) report that only 5% of nurse practitioners in the U.S. are specialized in pediatrics. As more pediatric nurse practitioners graduate, Responses hopefully, more opportunities for co-management will become available to the pediatric population. This stressor impacts my work area by relying on the pediatricians to complete all the work. Hiring a pediatric NP would help decrease their stress in the day-to-day job and allow more time to be spent with each child or newborn.

6052

Peer 1 JA

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is critical to delivering safe, quality care and is incorporated into the quadruple aim (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Additionally, evidence-based practice allows healthcare providers to ensure they deliver the best research-backed care. As upcoming nurse practitioners, students should be sure to join organizations that support the use of EBP. 

American Association of Nurse Practitioners

            The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) Responses is an organization and resource to utilize as healthcare professionals. The AANP’s mission encourages nurse practitioners and NP students to enhance their knowledge of providing high-quality, evidence-based care (AANP, n.d.-a). By joining this healthcare organization, one benefits from participating in continuing education and professional development opportunities (AANP, n.d.-a). EBP also appears throughout the AANP’s core values because they value promoting best practices and patient outcomes (AANP, n.d.-b). 

            Given that principles of EBP are at the root of the AANPs mission statement and core values, I would say this organization’s work is grounded in EPB. Melnyk (2018), a member of the AANP), explains how using EBP Responses has even been shown to reduce burnout, as it inspires practitioners to deliver care that improves patient outcomes. Melnyk (2018) encourages the use of EBP to members and includes a list of EBP resources directly from the AANP. 

            Given the information on the American Association of Nurse Practitioners website, my perception of this organization has not changed. I already felt this organization was very reputable. However, I do have more respect for the organization, knowing they support evidence-based practice at their core. As a nurse practitioner student, this organization would be appropriate to join to advocate for future patients.

Peer 2 AF

The Joint Commission (TJC) has been around since 1951 and is a well-known accrediting body (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). The Joint Commission compiles a set of standards derived from evidenced-based practice on patient safety, medication administration, medical errors, and many more (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). The Responses standards are revised consistently due to developments in technology and medicine which keeps relevant information up to date to provide high quality care to patients. The Joint Commission performs on-site surveys in  hospitals and many other healthcare settings to inspect the health practices, education, and patient safety measures implemented (History of The Joint Commission, 2022). This ensures that hospitals are following evidenced based practices (EBP) that create positive health outcomes for their patients. In addition, TJC assists with distributing valuable information and provides resources concerning the quality of care and safety of patients (Why Choose The Joint Commission, 2022). According to TJC, patient safety concerns are reviewedand evidenced-based practices are created as a remedy to the problem (Patient Safety, 2022). The Joint Commission consists of: The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare, Joint Commission Resources, and Joint Commission International (Joint Commission FAQS, 2022). Joint Commission Resources provides access to journals and educational resources (Joint Commission Responses FAQS, 2022). This allows EBP to be easily accessible to the public. Evidenced-based practice is stated in many areas of the TJC’s website such as in the standards of care, patient safety, and FAQs on The Joint Commission. This healthcare organization is rooted in evidenced-based practices because the standards of care originate from the solutions and studies of EBP.

         My perception has changed from the information found on the healthcare organization’s website. It has actually given me a clearer understanding on the need to be accredited and the standards that must be followed to provide quality care and the best outcomes for patients. The Joint Commission typically follows the care of a patient from the unit the patient is in and the interactions with healthcare professionals. They survey the current practices Responses instituted in hospitals and the knowledge healthcare workers have to determine if they adhere to the standards of practice.