Operation of the Accounting Information System (AIS) Assignment

In this graded discussion, we will be examining the operation of the Accounting Information System (AIS) with the use of problems and exercises from your textbook. The goal is to cover all of the requirements to ensure an opportunity for your successful completion of Course Project. Let’s start with Exercise 1-17A. Read about Coffee Shop Doughnuts and select one of the four requirements to answer. Back of Chapter 1 in the textbook.. Operation of the Accounting Information System (AIS) Assignment

Course Project – Exercise 1-17A

CoffeeShop Doughnuts has current assets of $280 million; property, plant, and equipment of $430 million; and other assets totaling $170 million. Current liabilities are $170 million and long-term liabilities total $300 million.

  1. Use these data to write Coffee Shop Doughnuts’ accounting equation.
  2. How much in resources does Coffee Shop have to work with?
  3. How much does CoffeeShop owe creditors?
  4. How much of the company’s assets do the CoffeeShop stockholders actually own? Operation of the Accounting Information System (AIS) Assignment

GB519-2: Evaluate Leadership Approaches to the Process of Decision-making

GB519-2: Evaluate Leadership Approaches to the Process of Decision-making

Case Study Part 1

Part 1 of the case, due in Unit 3, includes four elements: (1) creating the title page, (2) the completed abstract, (3) the APA-formatted Level 1 headings and Level 2 and Level 3 subheadings, and (4) a properly formatted preliminary reference list that includes no fewer than 5 sources, for a formal analysis paper. (Part 2 will be completed in Unit 4, and Part 3 will be completed in Unit 5.)

The case project spans Unit 3, Unit 4, and Unit 5. For the case project, you are to conduct research and complete an analysis of a manufacturing company. A list of 30 approved manufacturing organizations has been compiled from which you are to choose your organization for analysis.

ORDER PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Important Note: Do not delay — Read all instructions and start work on your project immediately during Unit 1. The Unit 4 Case Project Paper cannot be submitted later than the end of Unit 5. If you do not understand any aspect of the assignment, ask the instructor. GB519-2: Evaluate Leadership Approaches to the Process of Decision-making

Your project organization must be selected from the approved case company list located at the end of this document.

  1. Only the title page, abstract, properly APA-formatted headings and subheadings for the final analysis paper and preliminary reference list are due in Unit 3.
  2. The full case study will be due in Unit 4.
  3. A PowerPoint presentation for the case will be due in Unit 5.
  4. The case project should be considered a single assignment, not three separate assignments. Therefore, do not overemphasize the score on any single component of the case. Rather, take a broader and more accurate view of the case project as a single unified assignment worth a total of 200 points. The case project point distribution is as follows:

Part I (Due Unit 3) -The initial formatting/outline                =   25 Points

Part II (Due Unit 4) – The full paper (analysis)                   = 100 Points

Part III (Due Unit 5) – The case PPT presentation                 =   75 Points

Total Case Assignment Points                                 = 200 Points

  1. The textbook, assignment instructions, classroom/course assignment instructions, etc. use several terms interchangeably. The following terms can be understood as referring to your project or individual elements of the project: case project, project, case or case paper. If you have any questions about any of the terminology, please do not hesitate to ask in the Virtual Office.
  2. Much of the case project will be an exercise in developing your skill at following instructions. Therefore, be sure to read all assignment instructions (for all Units — 3, 4, and 5) very carefully before starting the writing process.

Gentle Reminder: If you do not understand plagiarism and how to avoid violating the rules of academic integrity, please review the tutorial in the classroom titled “Plagiarism.” It can be found under the Academic Tools tab. All written papers (and many of the Discussion Board posts) will be submitted to Turnitin to determine originality of content.

Unit 3 Case Part 1 Assignment Specifics: 

Part 1 of the case, due in Unit 3, includes creating the title page, abstract, Level 1 APA headings and Level 2 & 3 APA subheadings, and preliminary reference list for a formal analysis paper. However, you must preview the Units 4 and 5 assignment instructions also to fully understand the requirements for the Unit 3 Case Assignment. GB519-2: Evaluate Leadership Approaches to the Process of Decision-making

The order of presentation must follow the grading rubric order.

Be thorough! Short answers do not provide the necessary analysis or critical thinking. Be sure to complete all required rubric sections for all parts.

Important Notes: 

  1. Your Unit 3 Assignment should only include sufficient page length to include: title page, abstract, full paper headings and subheadings (which will be used for the full analysis in Unit 4) and a preliminary reference list.
  2. Use the APA template provided in the classroom Course Resources as the foundation for constructing your Unit 3 Assignment, but do not submit your assignment with any of the original APA template content remaining in your assignment Word® document.
  3. A properly formatted title page with running head and abstract is required.
  4. Do not include a table of contents.
  5. Do not repeat or copy the assignment question narratives. You may use abbreviated versions of the questions as headings and subheadings. Anything that artificially increases the length of the paper but does not add value to the analysis will result in a reduced score.
  6. For more specific information and guidance, please access the following resources available in the writing resources located within the Academic Success Center area in the left navigation pane: “How to Write an Abstract”
    1. “How to Get Help with Your Writing”
    2. “APA Headers and Title Page Tutorial”
    3. “Using Headings and Subheadings in APA”
    4. “APA Reference Page”
    5. “Formal Versus Informal Writing”
    6. “Using Sources”

After you have completed the Unit 3 Case Paper title page, abstract, outline, and preliminary reference list, upload your Word document to the Unit 3 Assignment Dropbox before 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Tuesday of Unit 3. Your assignment filename must use this format: LastName_FirstName_Unit#_AssignmentName 

For example: Smith_Joan_Unit3_CasePart1.

Assignments submitted late will be subject to the Late Policy described in the Syllabus.

GB519 Case Project: List of Manufacturing Companies for Analysis

1) Select a company that interests you from the 30 listed.

2) Go to Yahoo!® Finance and select the stock ticker symbol and gather information.

3) Go to the company’s corporate website and select the “Investor Relations” or “Financial Statement” link. GB519-2: Evaluate Leadership Approaches to the Process of Decision-making

4) Go to the Purdue Global Library and search for any articles about your company that may be available.

5) Conduct other web-based research about your company.

ORDER PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Case Study Part 2

This is Part 2 of the case study project and is due in Unit 4. (Part 3 will be due in Unit 5.)

The following Course Outcome is assessed in this assignment:

GB519-2: Evaluate leadership approaches to the process of decision-making.

Part 2 of the project, due at the end of Unit 4, requires you to complete an analysis of a manufacturing organization. This evaluation will also provide the foundation for Part 3 of the project.

For the case project Part 2, you are to conduct research and complete an analysis of the manufacturing company you selected.

Note: Do not delay — Read all instructions and start work on your project immediately during Unit 1. The Unit 4 Case Project Paper cannot be submitted later than the end of Unit 5. A 1-week (10%) late penalty will be assessed for papers submitted late.

Your project organization must be selected from the approved case company list located at the end of this document.

A title page with properly APA-formatted running head, an abstract, and reference pages are required. Review the “APA Template” and “APA Sample Paper” documents in the writing resources located within the Course Resources in the left navigation Content pane. Incorporate all feedback and guidance from your Unit 3 Case Part 1.

  1. Begin with an introduction to the organization. Identify its manufacturing segment. Detail briefly the products manufactured by your organization and the company’s market niche and/or customer base.
  2. Identify significant costs in your organization. Some of the topics to research and present about your organization include but are not limited to: (a) costs associated with environmental concerns, (b) cost behavior, (c) prevention costs, (d) appraisal (detection) costs, (e) internal failure costs, and (f) external failure costs.
  3. Include a section devoted to cost-volume-profit analysis (CVP). Review Chapters 18 and 19 in your textbook. The level of detail you include in this section is flexible. But, make sure your analysis is related to actual financial data from the company. Suggested metrics include the contribution margin, degree of operating leverage (DOL), break-even point, and others. Remember, it is vital that you determine whether or not you will have access to this information before you start the project. Otherwise, you may not have time to change organizations later during the course.
  4. Discuss budgeting considerations. Include the organization’s budget process (for example, whether it is top-down or bottom-up) and the organization’s budget variances, and discuss management decisions related to budgeting.
  5. Based on independent research and additional textbook readings, create a balanced scorecard (BSC), incorporating all four of the organizational dimensions (financial, customer, internal business, and learning & growth). Identify two or three strategic objectives (SOs), also known as critical success factors (CSFs), for each category/perspective. Then, evaluate and analyze your organization’s performance in relation to these critical success factors. (To help you with this part, review the material found on pages 14-19 and 24-20 to 24-22 of the textbook.) Do not simply cut and paste a BSC collected from an online source. Create your own BSC. GB519-2: Evaluate Leadership Approaches to the Process of Decision-making

Additional readings/references to use for this project:

Use an Advanced Search in the Purdue Global Library to access the following:

Balaji, M., Dinesh. S. N., & Parthiban. V. V. (2018). Applying balanced scorecards to supply chain performance: More enterprises in developing countries should adopt Kaplan and Norton innovation. ISE: Industrial & Systems Engineering at Work50(11), 42.

Eaton, D., & Kilby, G. (2015). Does your organizational culture support your business strategy? Journal for Quality & Participation37(4), 4.

  1. Discuss corporate sustainability and responsibility.
    1. a) Identify the concepts of corporate sustainability.
    2. b) Identify the topics related to corporate responsibility.
    3. c) Discuss how your organization implements the concepts of corporate sustainability and responsibility.
    4. d) Discuss how your organization could further benefit from additional attention to sustainability and responsibility.
  2. Analyze potential biases in the organization’s decision-making processes.
    1. a) Evaluate the role of heuristics in managerial decision-making within your organization.
    2. b) Evaluate how heuristics may bias your organization’s management decision-making.
  1. Finally, end with a summary review. (A formal “Conclusion” heading and section is required.) Use subheadings to discuss key strengths and weaknesses of the organization and describe recommendations to be made to the current organizational strategy.

Part 2 of the project should have a minimum of 8 and a maximum of 10, properly formatted, double-spaced pages of analysis. The assignment will be evaluated for content, analysis, critical thinking, grammar, spelling, punctuation, and formatting. So, be sure to proofread and then proofread again! Be certain that you do a “Spelling and Grammar” check on your project paper before it is submitted to the Dropbox.

Include the appropriate headings and subheadings for every section of the project. A good strategy will be to use the assignment rubric as a basic outline for headings and subheadings.

The 8- to 10-page minimum/maximum does not include the required title, abstract, and reference list pages. Do not use enlarged type, extra line spaces, extra points at the end of a line, oversized graphs and charts, or unusual margins to artificially inflate the page length — the score will be significantly reduced if the proper APA formatting for these elements is not applied.

Do not use wordy phrases. Do use economy of expression. Use concise and precise language that avoids slang or colloquial expressions. For example, instead of using “on the other hand,” simply use “alternatively.”

Your project must be presented in accordance with the guidance found in the APA Publication Manual, 7th edition. The Writing Lab is a tremendous resource, so please take full advantage of the great help available there. You may access the Writing Lab by going to your My Studies tab located at the campus home page. Then, access the Academic Success Center link. The writing resources will be located there for your access.

One very important suggestion will be to use the Writing Center’s paper review service. You do not have to wait until your paper is fully completed to ask for a review. One thing to note, though — the Writing Lab will not be able to provide any feedback related to the specifics of the assignment content. However, they will be able to provide sample guidance about spelling, grammar, formatting, punctuation, and all elements of a formal written analysis. GB519-2: Evaluate Leadership Approaches to the Process of Decision-making

Remember, this assignment will be processed using the Turnitin software to determine the level of original content in the assignment. Please review the Syllabus and the University Academic Policy regarding plagiarism. Excessive similarity to existing works will result in varying consequences, depending on the nature of the similarity.

ORDER PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

You must name your assignment using this format: LastName_FirstName_Unit#_AssignmentName. For example: Smith_Joan_Unit4_CasePart2.

The Unit 4 Case Paper Assignment must be submitted no later than the end of Unit 5 for consideration. Assignments submitted late will be subject to a 10% late penalty. Assignments submitted after the end of Unit 5 will not be accepted for credit.

Please review the rubric document for a complete understanding of how your assignments will be assessed. Doing so will help you successfully complete your assignments.

LOOKING AHEAD

You may submit the case study Part 3 PowerPoint presentation only after the case study Part 2 feedback file has been returned to you.

Submit your completed assignment to the Unit 4 Assignment Dropbox. Assignments are due Tuesday 11:59 p.m. ET of their assigned unit.

Case Study Part 3

Turn in Part 3 of the case study at the end of Unit 5.

The following Course Outcome is assessed in this assignment:

GB519-3: Examine global interconnectedness as it applies to managerial accounting and decision-making.

The third and final part of the case study is due at the end of Unit 5. Part 3 of the case study is a PowerPoint presentation with voiceover recording. The voiceover will be the narrative you would be presenting if this were a live presentation. You will be making a presentation to the board of directors of your organization.

Your Unit 4 Case Study Part 2 Assignment will be the starting point for your PowerPoint presentation. Begin with a brief introduction on the introductory slide. Then, using your Unit 4 case study assignment as the basis, build a PowerPoint presentation that discusses all required components of the analysis of your selected manufacturing organization. However, the presentation will include an additional segment not required in the case paper. If you have not submitted the Unit 4 Case Study Part 2 Assignment, you will not be eligible to submit Unit 5 Case Study Part 3.  GB519-2: Evaluate Leadership Approaches to the Process of Decision-making

Like the Unit 4 Case Study Part 2 Assignment, your PPT presentation should:

  • Be based on the unit reading and additional articles.
  • Begin with a brief review of the organization. Keep in mind that the members of the board may or may not have read the report you completed in Parts 1 and 2 of the project. Even though this will be a brief presentation, it should include all essential information and data.
  • Identify significant costs in your organization.
  • Include a section devoted to cost-volume-profit analysis (CVP).
  • Discuss budgeting considerations. Include the organization’s budget process and budget variances and discuss management decisions related to budgeting.
  • Present a balanced scorecard, incorporating all four of the organizational dimensions (financial, customer, internal business, and learning and growth).

New Requirement for the Presentation: Next, incorporate a discussion of “global interconnectedness” as it applies to your organization. Use the textbook and the additional article readings as a basis for analysis. For example, how do global economic pressures impact your organization? Are there any direct or indirect international competitors? If so, how is that competition managed? Discuss any heuristic implications or biases based on global interconnectedness.

Finally, end with a summary review of the performance evaluation. (A formal “Conclusion” slide is required.) What are the key strengths and weaknesses of the organization? What changes would you recommend be made to the current organizational strategy?

Additional content could include a discussion of any potential biases that could potentially impact the outcome of the decision-making process related to the continued success of the organization.

The PowerPoint presentation should include 12–14 slides. The first slide must be a title slide, and the final slide must be your reference list. The audio presentation (voiceover) should be 15–20 minutes long. In addition to recording the voiceover, the text of your voiceover must be written into the Notes section of each slide.

Proper grammar and spelling will be an important part of the assignment. So, be sure to perform a spell check.

Important Note: One of the most important techniques to use in any PowerPoint presentation is to create clean, crisp slides that use a minimal number of bullet points. If the slide is too cluttered, the presentation suffers. Therefore, the Notes section underneath each slide should be the place where all of the topics in that slide are thoroughly developed. Do not add the body of your presentation to the slides. Only incorporate the main “talking points,” then use the Notes section to add all of the body, thereby creating a more professional and robust presentation. Do NOT simply read the text of your Unit 4 Case Paper for the presentation; that would be ineffective.

Name your assignment PPT filename using this format: LastName_FirstName_Unit#_AssignmentName. For example: Smith_Joan_Unit5_CasePart3.

Assignments submitted late will be subject to the Late Policy described in your Syllabus.

Please review the rubric document for a complete understanding of how your assignments will be assessed. Doing so will help you successfully complete your assignments.

Submit your completed assignment to the Unit 5 Assignment Dropbox. Assignments are due Tuesday 11:59 p.m. ET of their assigned unit. GB519-2: Evaluate Leadership Approaches to the Process of Decision-making

 

 

Nursing Theory

Nursing Theory

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Section V: Grand Theories about Care or Caring Section VI: Middle Range Theories Chapter 19: Theory of Nursing as Caring Chapter 20: Transitions Theory Discussion 6

Discussion Question (Assignment worth 3 points) (Two Parts): After reading and reviewing the assigned chapters we come to understand that humans are intrinsically motivated to care for others. Based on this theory, how do you provide care?

Part One

Reviewing the Nursing as Caring Theory, we come to understand that humans are intrinsically motivated to care for others. Based on this theory, how do you provide care for someone who is a criminal that needs care? (Example, a prisoner is brought to your unit for care, after being beaten for molesting a child).

Part Two

The transitions theory incorporates intervention and comprehension of what has taken place. How do you apply the transitions theory to your current nursing practice?

Book:

Smith, M. & Parker, M. (2014). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company. ISBN-13: 978-0-8036-3312-4 (Required) Publication Manual American Psychological Association (APA) (7th ed.). 2009 ISBN: 978-143…

Mobile Access Privacy Concerns

Mobile Access Privacy Concerns

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

In this writing assignment, you will write a one-page paper in which you describe privacy concerns pertaining to mobile access of informatics systems.

Step 1 Think about privacy concerns in relationship to mobile access in your own clinical practice in the workplace.

Step 2 Include responses to the following questions as you write your paper:

  • In what ways might the mobile access of healthcare informatics systems be used in your clinical setting?
  • What concerns would you have about the mobile access of healthcare informatics systems in your clinical setting?
  • How could these concerns be addressed to ensure privacy or confidentiality?
  • Provide a recent example of a patient’s security breech from the news and explain how it could be prevented.

Cite any sources in APA format.

Windshield Survey

Windshield Survey

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Focus group is geriatric population (over 65)-Cartersville GA, outskirts of Atlanta, GA

Conduct a “Windshield Survey” in a section of your community. Instructions for the survey can be found in Stanhope and Lancaster (2020) on page 383, Table 17.5.  As you notice, conducting a Windshield Survey requires that you either walk around or drive around a particular section of the community and take notes about what you observe. A Windshield Survey cannot be conducted by reviewing websites or Google Earth only. It requires actually taking a look at the selected area of the community. This survey should be focused on the problem and population you have selected for your practicum project. If you choose, for example, obesity among Hispanic schoolchildren, you might want to locate a section of the community where many Hispanic children live, or you might want to conduct the Windshield Survey around where Hispanic children attend school. If Hispanic children are not found in a specific section of your community (e.g., Chinatown in San Francisco or Harlem in New York), then you may select the section of the community where you live or work but pay particular attention to your practicum population and practicum problem as you conduct a survey of the community as viewed through the eyes of the public health nurse.

By Day 7 of Week 3

Submit a 3- to 4-page paper including:

· Introduction to the community, including the name of the community and any interesting or historical facts you would like to add about where you live

· Photographs of the selected area of the community that serve as evidence of your observations and hypotheses

· Windshield Survey findings, including a description of the section of your community that you chose to survey

· Description of the Vulnerable Population and Available Resources

o Demographics of the vulnerable population

o What social determinants create their vulnerable status?

o What community strengths exist to assist this population?

· Conclusions based on Nursing Assessment of the Community

o Based on what you have found, what conclusions can you draw about your community and your selected population for your practicum?

· Select at least 5 scholarly resources to support your assessment. Websites may be included but the paper must include scholarly resources in its development.

Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet

Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

 

Name: _______________________________________________________________________

 

Date:_________________________________________________________________________

Complete the following required worksheet using the required article for the current session.  Access the required article from the assignment guidelines.

Purpose of the Study:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the purpose of the study.  Describe what the study is about.
Research & Design:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the description of the type of research and the design of the study.  Include how it supports the purpose (aim or intent) of the study.
Sample:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the population (sample) for the study; include key characteristics, sample size, sampling technique.
Data Collection:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one data that was collected and how the data was collected from the study.
 
Data Analysis:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the data analysis/ tests performed or one method of data analysis from the study; include what you know/learned about the descriptive or statistical test or data analysis method.
Limitations:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one limitation reported in the study.
Findings/Discussion:  Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the authors’ findings/discussion reported in the study. Include one interesting detail you learned from reading the study.
Reading Research Literature:  Summarize why it is important for you to read and understand research literature.  Summarize what you learned from completing the reading research literature activity worksheet.

 

Nursing

Nursing

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

 

Assignment Title

Title page per APA format

 

 

 

  • This assignment template serves as a paper template to develop the week 5 case study and may not be all inclusive. You must also refer to the assignment rubric for specific requirements for this assignment. Your paper is graded to the rubric requirements. *

 

Title matches title on title page

The introductory paragraph is written here. Remember to remove all instructions from your paper. These are in red ink.

Assessment

Primary Diagnosis  diagnosis (ICD10 code)

pathophysiology A brief pathophysiology statement which is no longer that two sentences, paraphrased and includes common signs and symptoms of the diagnosis. Includes citation to an approved source (author, year). Review the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study document. This applies to all sections of this paper. 

pertinent positive findings includes citation to an approved source (author, year). Review the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study documents. This applies to all sections of this paper.

pertinent negative findings includes citation to an approved source (author, year). Review the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study documents. This applies to all sections of this paper.

rationale for the diagnosis includes a brief 1-2 sentence statement, which links the subjective and objective case study findings including provided lab data and interpretation of the labs. Include a statement linking those lab results to your ADA guideline reference.  Includes citation to the ADA guideline used to determine this diagnosis.

Secondary Diagnosis  diagnosis (ICD10 code)

            *You can have more than one secondary diagnosis. A minimum is required. Secondary diagnoses are additional diagnoses you have identified from the exam, lab findings today or the PMH*

Pathophysiology  A brief pathophysiology statement which is no longer that two sentences, paraphrased and includes common signs and symptoms of the diagnosis (author, year).

pertinent positive findings (author, year).

 pertinent negative findings (author, year).

rationale for the diagnosis-includes a brief 1-2 sentence statement, which links the subjective and objective findings including any provided lab data and interpretation of the diagnostic testing. The rationale includes a citation to a scholarly reference (author, year)

Differential Diagnosis  diagnosis (ICD10 code)

            *You can have more than one differential diagnosis. A minimum of one is required.  Differential diagnoses are additional diagnoses you are considering but require further testing to confirm or rule out based on the appropriate guidelines for the diagnosis. *Additional testing must be listed within the diagnostics section.* 

pathophysiology- A brief pathophysiology statement which is no longer that two sentences, paraphrased and includes common signs and symptoms of the diagnosis (author, year).

rationale for the diagnosis includes a brief 1-2 sentence statement explaining why you are considering this differential diagnosis. The statement includes the pertinent subjective and objective findings and any diagnostic data, which supports further evaluation. Includes citation (author, year).

 

Plan

Diagnostics

Lab test (each lab/diagnostic test is listed individually with rationale to follow). Include the timeframe of when the lab is to be drawn. *This is labs or tests you will order in the future, not an explanation of the labs that have already been completed.*

rationale: each rationale contains the EBP statement supporting the necessity of the test and includes the name of the diagnosis which is listed in the assessment section.* If this diagnosis is not listed in the assessment section then it must be added to order the diagnostic testing*. Includes a citation to an approved reference from the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study document which supports not only the test but the timing of the lab draw.

Medications        *each medication is listed individually with rationale, including the required OTC*

Medication- written in prescription format (see NR 601 Resources)

Rationale. The rationale for each medication includes the diagnosis which is listed in the assessment section and contains the EBP statement supporting the necessity of the medication. If this diagnosis is not listed in the assessment section then it must be added to include any medication. Includes a citation to an approved reference from the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study document.

 

Education section includes personalized detailed education on all five (5) subcategories: diagnosis, each medication purpose and side effects, diet, personalized appropriate exercise recommendations and warning sign for diagnosis and medications if applicable. You do not need an introduction paragraph. All education steps are linked to a listed diagnosis, paraphrased, and include a paraphrased EBP rationale. If this diagnosis is not listed in the assessment section then it must be added to include the education content here. Each education section includes a citation to an approved reference from the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study document

Diagnoses.

             Includes personalized detailed education for each diagnosis listed in the assessment section. This includes specific information for this particular client. Education includes a citation to an appropriate reference. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference.

Medications.

includes personalized detailed education for each medication listed in the medication section. Each medication is listed and then explained. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference.

Diet.

             includes personalized detailed education for dietary recommendations as determined by the listed diagnoses in the assessment section. This includes specific dietary information. A referral to cover this requirement is not sufficient. If weight loss is recommended then specific weight loss targets must be included. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference.

Exercise.

            includes personalized detailed education for exercise recommendations as determined by the listed diagnoses in the assessment section.. List specific exercises that are appropriate for this patient. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference.

Warning Signs for diagnoses and mediations

            includes personalized detailed education as determined by the listed diagnoses and medications. No listed education is common knowledge, all statements must include an in text citation to an appropriate reference..

 

Referral

Specialty practice or service   (each referral is listed individually with rationale to follow)

rationale: each rationale contains the EBP statement supporting the necessity of the referral and includes the name of the diagnosis which is listed in the assessment section. Includes a citation to an approved reference from the Reference Guidelines for FNP Case Study document. Any referrals for the listed primary diagnosis must be cited from the chosen ADA guideline.

 

Follow up

            Follow up includes a specific time frame ( 1week, 1 month) , not a time range, to return to PCP office for next scheduled appointment. Includes EBP rationale with in text citation. Refer to the rubric for full section requirements.

Medication Cost

See rubric for section requirements.

 

Conclusion

 A summary paragraph

 

 

Clinical Chart SOAP note

See rubric instructions for this section. This clinical SOAP note summarizes this case study patient encounter. All included information must be consistent with provided case study information and your assessment and plan listed above. No additional information should be added here.

References

Are listed on a separate page and formatted per APA guidelines.

 

 

 

 

 

Concept Map

Concept Map

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Create a concept map of a chosen condition, disease, or disorder with glucose regulation or metabolic balance considerations. Write a brief narrative (2–3 pages) that explains why the evidence cited in the concept map and narrative are valuable and relevant, as well as how specific interprofessional strategies will help to improve the outcomes presented in the concept map.

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you should complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

The biopsychosocial (BPS) approach to care is a way to view all aspects of a patient’s life. It encourages medical practitioners to take into account not only the physical and biological health of a patient, but all considerations like mood, personality, and socioeconomic characteristics. This course will also explore aspects of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment (the three Ps) as they relate to specific conditions, diseases, or disorders.

The first assessment is one in which you will create a concept map to analyze and organize the treatment of a specific patient with a specific condition, disease, or disorder.

Assessment Instructions

Scenario

You have already learned about evidence-based practice and quality improvement initiatives in previous courses. You will use this information to guide your assessments, while also implementing new concepts introduced in this course. For this assessment, you will develop a concept map and provide supporting evidence and explanations. You may use the case studies presented in the Vila Health: Concept Maps as Diagnostic Tools media, a case study from the literature or your practice that is relevant to the list of conditions below, or another relevant case study you have developed. This case study will provide you with the context for creating your concept map. You may also use the practice context from the case study or extrapolate the case study information and data into your own practice setting. Think carefully when you are selecting the case study for this assessment, as you may choose to build upon it for the second assessment as well.

Some example conditions, diseases and disorders that are relevant to metabolic balance and glucose regulation considerations are:

  • Cancer.
  • Diabetes (type 2).
  • HIV/AIDS.
  • Hyperthyroidism.
  • Hypothyroidism.
  • Metabolic syndrome.
  • Obesity.
  • Polycycstic ovary syndrome.
  • Prediabetes.
  • Pregnancy.

Instructions

Develop a concept map and a short narrative that supports and further explains how the concept map is constructed. You may choose to use the Concept Map Template (in the Resources) as a starting point for your concept map, but are not required to do so. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your evidence-based plan addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Concept Map scoring guide and the Guiding Questions: Concept Map document to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

Part 1: Concept Map
  • Develop an evidence-based concept map that illustrates a plan for achieving high-quality outcomes for a condition that has impaired glucose or metabolic imbalance as related aspects.
Part 2: Additional Evidence (Narrative)
  • Justify the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis for your concept map.
  • Analyze how interprofessional strategies applied to the concept map can lead to achievement of desired outcomes.
  • Construct concept map and linkage to additional evidence in a way that facilitates understanding of key information and links.
  • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

  • Assessment 1 Example [PDF].

Additional Requirements

  • Length of submission: Your concept map should be on a single page, if at all possible. You can submit the concept map as a separate file, if you need to. Your additional evidence narrative should be 2–3 double-spaced, typed pages. Your narrative should be succinct yet substantive.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that supports your concept map, decisions made regarding care, and interprofessional strategies. Resources should be no more than five years old.
  • APA formatting:
    • For the concept map portion of this assessment: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Please include references both in-text and in the reference page that follows your narrative.
    • For the narrative portion of this assessment: use the APA Paper Template linked in the Resources. An APA Template Tutorial is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your analysis. You do not need to include an abstract for this assessment.

Questions to Consider:

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
SHOW LESSThe assessment will be based on the case of a specific patient with a specific condition, disease, or disorder. Think about an experience you have had treating a patient with a condition, disease, or disorder that interests you, or one of the cases presented in the Vila Health: Concept Maps as Diagnostic Tools media simulation.

Vila Health attached below as images

examples attached

templates attached

*****Must get distinguished in all categories or revise*****

  • What is the primary condition, disease, or disorder affecting the patient?
    • What types of experience have you had working with patients with this condition, disease, or disorder?
    • How does this condition, disease, or disorder typically present?
    • What are the recommended treatment options?
      • What, if any, characteristics of an individual patient should be kept in mind when determining a course of treatment.
  • How have you used concept maps to help plan and organize care?
    • What are the advantages of concept maps, from your point of view?
    • How could concept maps be more useful?
  • How can interprofessional communication and collaboration strategies assist in driving patient safety, efficiency, and quality outcomes with regard to specific clinical and biopsychosocial considerations?
    • What interprofessional strategies do you recommend health care providers take in order to meet patient-centered safety and outcome goals?

The Synthesis Essay – Joining Conversation

The Synthesis Essay – Joining Conversation

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Synthesis writing is not argumentative in nature. This type of academic writing allows you to become knowledgeable on a focused narrowed subject by engaging in current research, and examining various perspectives and opinions. You will analyze your sources’ responses to a research question you have developed and will present those views as a “conversation” between your sources. You will then present your own view of the question, a view that reflects your “wallowing in the complexity” of the issue in order to gain experience working with synthesis.  Synthesis is the ability to create a new whole, your own perspective, by studying alternative views on an issue.  In other words, the “new whole” is your own point of view on an issue, something you will obtain through the combination of analyzing the ideas of others and relating them to one another.

Skills: The purpose of English 111 is to help you develop and practice writing and thinking skills essential to your success in college and in your professional life beyond school. Drawing on Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Domains, we will focus on developing writerly “moves” that characterize strong written communication. This assignment will ask you to practice the following writing skills: Analyzing, Evaluating, and Synthesizing.

Knowledge: This assignment will focus on developing knowledge in the following course learning objectives:

  • (2) Develop and apply strategies for critical reading, critical thinking, and information literacy.
  • (4) Analyze and synthesize researched information to develop and support original claims.
  • (7) Employ correct techniques of style, formatting, and documentation when incorporating quotes, paraphrases, and summaries from sources into compositions.

Task:

This paper will build on writing projects you have done previously in the course and will utilize the same topic and research you compiled for the Critical Annotated Bibliography.  You may (and likely will) refocus and revise your guiding research question for this project, but your overall topic should stay the same.  Textual support for this essay will come from The Little Seagull Handbook Chapters W-16 “Reading Strategies,” R-3 “Synthesizing Ideas” and R-4 “Integrating Sources and Avoiding Plagiarism”

Process:

1) You will choose five (5) sources from the class core readings to review looking for patterns and common themes reoccurring in these readings.

2) You will then form a focused research question drawn from the core readings

3) Construct a synthesis grid to help you organize the drafting of this essay

4)  From the synthesis grid, construct a two part analytical thesis statement, which explains what current scholars are saying about your topic in the literature and your own developing position on this subject.

5) You will then use the synthesis grid to begin organizing and drafting your initial draft of the Synthesis Essay.

Evidence-Based Practice Change Process

Evidence-Based Practice Change Process

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  • CO 2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO 2)
  • CO 8: Selects evidence for best practices when planning professional nursing care involving systems, processes, and devices for individuals, families, aggregates and communities. (PO 8)

Points

The assignment is worth 225 points.

Due Date

Submit your completed assignment by Sunday end of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m. MT.

Directions

Please do not use any of the Nurse Daniel information for your own topic, nursing intervention, or change project. Nurse Daniel serves as an example only to illustrate the change process.

  1. Please review the infographic as way to guide you in getting started with your assignment: Developing an Assignment with Integrity (Links to an external site.)
  2. View a short tutorial with tips for completing this assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Change Process Assignment Tutorial (Links to an external site.) or by reading the transcript (Links to an external site.).
  3. Download the EBP Change Process form (Links to an external site.) during Week 1. The use of this specific form is REQUIRED 
  4. Identify a clinical topic and related nursing practice issue you think needs to be changed.
  5. Locate a systematic review on your topic from the CCN Library databases. Be sure this involves nursing actions.
  6. Work through each step of the ACE Star Model as outlined on the assignment form (Star Points 1-5: Discovery, Summary, Translation, Implementation, and Evaluation). Respond to the instructions provided on the form.
  7. Follow the activities and thinking of Nurse Daniel in Weeks 1-6 in the ‘Illustration’ part of each lesson. He will be working through a clinical topic and nursing practice issue to demonstrate a change (ACE Star Model and systematic review).
  8. Work on a portion of the process each week, as the illustration unfolds.

Best Practices

  • Please reach out to your instructor for feedback or assistance with your PICOT question as needed.
  • Required and Additional Background Reading in Weeks 1 and 2 under Readings is available for more information on the ACE Star Model and the use of systematic reviews.
  • Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.
  • Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

Scholarly Sources and Citations

  • Please cite any references (in APA format) of your systematic review or other scholarly document (optional) as needed.
  • Paraphrasing information, rather than quoting, is expected. No quotes for this assignment please!

**Academic Integrity**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.